Paul Beuk 21 May 2007 11:45:00

Black, why not submit those as weblinks? See Navigation Panel for the link.

Dmitry Gavryushin 21 May 2007 09:22:54

Chaves, A. - ... PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS ... OPOMYZOIDEA ... A GENERIC REVISION OF AULACIGASTER ... - 12023Kb http://tinyurl.com/ywvvsy

Dmitry Gavryushin 21 May 2007 09:22:14

Kerr, Peter H. - Revision of the Genera of the Rhagionidae of the World (Diptera: Brachycera) - 41105Kb http://tinyurl.com/yscju2

Kahis 18 May 2007 14:09:02

For the FAQ: If you don't see the "Quick Reply" field, you'll need to use the post reply button and re-accept the Code of Conduct.

jorgemotalmeida 16 May 2007 09:03:17

good idea.

Paul Beuk 16 May 2007 08:20:23

Maybe take the discussion to the forum...?

jorgemotalmeida 16 May 2007 00:16:23

(*...)unique that can be considered discrete units. the genes are virtually ethernal, the species not.

jorgemotalmeida 16 May 2007 00:14:27

(*...) on the basis of certain specialized features, and that had a common ancestor and unique evolutionary history." and in nature we had so many greys, that perhaps just genes are the uniqu

jorgemotalmeida 16 May 2007 00:12:34

there are some versions for species... one of the best but even with problems... is this one: "discrete group of individual organisms that can be diagnosed, or defined on the basis of certain spe

Xespok 15 May 2007 11:30:49

No, actually I think is doable for macroscopical organisms, it is a question of resources and a strict definition of species. For microscopic creatures defining the species does not make too much sens

jorgemotalmeida 15 May 2007 00:04:27

*were found (not was found). In tropics, it is very hard to follow in vivo the biology of species. And there are other problems: hybridism, for example! And what about the species that will go extinc

jorgemotalmeida 15 May 2007 00:01:23

i think that is an impossible task to describe even the million of species. For example, recently was found new mamifers.. and cycliophors...

Xespok 14 May 2007 17:57:12

Yes, I think the goals are different. EOL give species level description of every species. TOL - understanding relationships between life forms.

Kahis 14 May 2007 14:43:32

proctoss: not all all. Unline the EoL, the ToL doesn't go to species level in most lifeforms.

proctoss 12 May 2007 15:52:35

Interestingly enough, but it is a direct competitor of the existing project Tree of Life http://tolweb.org/tree/

Xespok 11 May 2007 09:19:39

Yes, I think the EOL is a good and necessary project. Let us see the details first.

jorgemotalmeida 10 May 2007 15:52:54

http://tinyurl.com/2ggtxt

jorgemotalmeida 10 May 2007 11:43:23

funny... today was launched the megaloman project ENCYCLOPEDIA OF LIFE: http://www.eol.org We can participate with diptera! What do you think?

Zeegers 10 May 2007 09:59:06

Thanks Theo

Paul Beuk 10 May 2007 08:14:52

Coding the restrictions per user is coming along quite nicely. Hope to finish it tomorrow.