jorgemotalmeida 27 May 2007 16:30:25

what? here it is cold and it's raining.. the weather is chaotic!! more hot in North, and more cold in South. very unusual to be cold here in these days.

Nikita Vikhrev 27 May 2007 16:16:19

Is it summer? No. 32 in Moscow, 36 promised. It is summer!

Kahis 27 May 2007 14:56:19

+23 C and a southerly wind carrying a steady stream of migrating Episyrphus. The summer is officially here

jorgemotalmeida 26 May 2007 19:31:53

what a fly that jokin photographed!! new family for diptera.info. Nemestrinidae! What a beauty.

Paul Beuk 24 May 2007 14:25:16

Noticed there had to be an error in the Forum Threads Limiter. Should be corrected now.

Paul Beuk 22 May 2007 11:15:08

All changes executed.

Nikita Vikhrev 22 May 2007 10:03:22

Paul, change, please in new photos: Pegoma to Pegomya Scato to Scathophaga.

Dmitry Gavryushin 21 May 2007 11:59:57

OK - I forgot about it

Paul Beuk 21 May 2007 11:45:00

Black, why not submit those as weblinks? See Navigation Panel for the link.

Dmitry Gavryushin 21 May 2007 09:22:54

Chaves, A. - ... PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS ... OPOMYZOIDEA ... A GENERIC REVISION OF AULACIGASTER ... - 12023Kb http://tinyurl.com/ywvvsy

Dmitry Gavryushin 21 May 2007 09:22:14

Kerr, Peter H. - Revision of the Genera of the Rhagionidae of the World (Diptera: Brachycera) - 41105Kb http://tinyurl.com/yscju2

Kahis 18 May 2007 14:09:02

For the FAQ: If you don't see the "Quick Reply" field, you'll need to use the post reply button and re-accept the Code of Conduct.

jorgemotalmeida 16 May 2007 09:03:17

good idea.

Paul Beuk 16 May 2007 08:20:23

Maybe take the discussion to the forum...?

jorgemotalmeida 16 May 2007 00:16:23

(*...)unique that can be considered discrete units. the genes are virtually ethernal, the species not.

jorgemotalmeida 16 May 2007 00:14:27

(*...) on the basis of certain specialized features, and that had a common ancestor and unique evolutionary history." and in nature we had so many greys, that perhaps just genes are the uniqu

jorgemotalmeida 16 May 2007 00:12:34

there are some versions for species... one of the best but even with problems... is this one: "discrete group of individual organisms that can be diagnosed, or defined on the basis of certain spe

Xespok 15 May 2007 11:30:49

No, actually I think is doable for macroscopical organisms, it is a question of resources and a strict definition of species. For microscopic creatures defining the species does not make too much sens

jorgemotalmeida 15 May 2007 00:04:27

*were found (not was found). In tropics, it is very hard to follow in vivo the biology of species. And there are other problems: hybridism, for example! And what about the species that will go extinc

jorgemotalmeida 15 May 2007 00:01:23

i think that is an impossible task to describe even the million of species. For example, recently was found new mamifers.. and cycliophors...