Diptera.info :: Identification queries :: Diptera (adults)
 Sciomyzidae for id. (copula)
|
|
| Klaas |
Posted on 20-06-2009 20:34
|
 Member Location: Posts: 655 Joined: 15.10.08 |
20 june 2009, The Netherlands, Voorsterbos. In deciduous forrest near small stream. I can't find a similar species in the gallery, but perhaps i overlook it. Close to Euthycera? Klaas Klaas attached the following image:  [144Kb] |
|
|
|
| Sundew |
Posted on 20-06-2009 21:14
|
 Member Location: Berlin and Baden-Württemberg, Germany Posts: 3939 Joined: 28.07.07 |
My photos of Euthycera fumigata look rather similar. Yours is very good quality! I have always problems as to an insufficient depth of focus if I try to depict this species... Edited by Sundew on 20-06-2009 21:18 |
|
|
|
| Nikita Vikhrev |
Posted on 21-06-2009 07:44
|
 Member Location: Moscow, Russia Posts: 9551 Joined: 24.05.05 |
Not fumigata, it is E.chaerophylli
Nikita Vikhrev - Zool Museum of Moscow University |
|
|
|
| Jan Willem |
Posted on 21-06-2009 11:54
|
 Member Location: Waalwijk, The Netherlands Posts: 2168 Joined: 24.07.04 |
Are you sure Nikita? The border of the wings seem a bit too dark for E. charophylii. Furthermore the arista doesn't seem to be long-plumose (and not mainly black), more densely whitis pubescent. This all seems to match E. fumigata more closely. Furthermore only a few specimens of E. charophylii are known from The Netherlands, which I admit is not much of an argument.
Edited by Jan Willem on 21-06-2009 11:56 Jan Willem van Zuijlen |
|
|
|
| Nikita Vikhrev |
Posted on 21-06-2009 12:19
|
|
Member Location: Moscow, Russia Posts: 9551 Joined: 24.05.05 |
Of course, Jan, I got confused: arista is white and it surely means that it is not chaerophylli!
Nikita Vikhrev - Zool Museum of Moscow University |
|
|
|
| Jump to Forum: |