Gallery Links
Users Online
· Guests Online: 31

· Members Online: 0

· Total Members: 5,092
· Newest Member: LV
Forum Threads
Theme Switcher
Switch to:
Last Seen Users
· ViktorNebenf...< 5 mins
· eklans< 5 mins
· karl700:09:44
· Nikita Vikhrev00:49:36
· Moumoule00:51:39
· Volker00:53:22
· JWV02:02:55
· smol02:13:22
· EsinM03:54:36
· pierred05:41:56
Latest Photo Additions
View Thread
Diptera.info :: Identification queries :: Diptera (adults)
 Print Thread
Spaziphora ?
Jan Willem
#1 Print Post
Posted on 28-07-2018 13:12
User Avatar

Member

Location: Waalwijk, The Netherlands
Posts: 2169
Joined: 24.07.04

This Scathophagidae was collected at light in "De Kaaistoep" (Tilburg, the Netherlands) on July 14th.
It is a specimen in 70% ethanol.

Could this be Saziphora?
Jan Willem attached the following image:


[186.76Kb]
Jan Willem van Zuijlen
 
Jan Willem
#2 Print Post
Posted on 28-07-2018 13:13
User Avatar

Member

Location: Waalwijk, The Netherlands
Posts: 2169
Joined: 24.07.04

Head:
Jan Willem attached the following image:


[185.39Kb]
Jan Willem van Zuijlen
 
Jan Willem
#3 Print Post
Posted on 28-07-2018 13:14
User Avatar

Member

Location: Waalwijk, The Netherlands
Posts: 2169
Joined: 24.07.04

Genitalia:
Jan Willem attached the following image:


[150.72Kb]
Jan Willem van Zuijlen
 
Jan Willem
#4 Print Post
Posted on 28-07-2018 13:17
User Avatar

Member

Location: Waalwijk, The Netherlands
Posts: 2169
Joined: 24.07.04

I understood that the coloration of the legs is highly variable.
Jan Willem van Zuijlen
 
johnes81
#5 Print Post
Posted on 28-07-2018 18:30
User Avatar

Member

Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 1980
Joined: 15.10.16

Ozerov has a document about this genus:

http://zmmu.msu.r...20Inet.pdf

the acute apex of the antennae, bare arista and spatulate palpi match the description. Dr. Ozerov says only one strong katepisternal is present. I see a second bristle but i can't tell where it is coming from.

Anyway, only Spaziphora hydromyzina is recorded for Germany and the surstyli don't match the photo in Ozerov's work. The surstyli look more like S. cincta but they are missing the curve. Maybe you find a new species.

I can write to Ozerov and ask him to look at this post for you.

John and Nini. Naturalists not experts.
 
Jan Willem
#6 Print Post
Posted on 29-07-2018 03:46
User Avatar

Member

Location: Waalwijk, The Netherlands
Posts: 2169
Joined: 24.07.04

Thank you for your response and for the PDF of the paper of Ozerov. It would be great if you could ask Dr. Ozerov to have a look at this post!
The difference in shape of the surstyli might also be caused by a different angle under which the picture has been taken.
This is the first time I have seen a specimen of this genus, so I'm not at all familiar.
Jan Willem van Zuijlen
 
johnes81
#7 Print Post
Posted on 29-07-2018 09:00
User Avatar

Member

Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 1980
Joined: 15.10.16

Hello Jan,

I have sent an email to Dr. Ozerov. I've asked him to look at this thread. I know he is busy, so we will wait. I've told him that i suspect Spaziphora cincta male.

I have no experience with Spaziphora. I've never seen one before. I have alot of experience with various genitalia. I know most of the quirks and i've learned alot about matching genitalia to drawings. Sometimes drawings are made while the genitalia is still attached to the abdomen and sometimes drawings are made after dissection. Sometimes dissection alters the physics of the genitalia, thus creating a curve or otherwise different perspective. I often ask an expert in such situations just to be sure that i am correct. Sometimes a curve is important and it isn't angle.

I am aware that it is possible to discover a new species from this genus. Anyway, if it is S. cincta, then it should be a first record for you. I know that it isn't recorded for Germany.

Best wishes,
John
John and Nini. Naturalists not experts.
 
Jan Willem
#8 Print Post
Posted on 29-07-2018 09:24
User Avatar

Member

Location: Waalwijk, The Netherlands
Posts: 2169
Joined: 24.07.04

Thank you John,

As far as I can judge it does seem to be closer to S. hydromyzina. Furthermore, S. cincta is a species with a Nearctic distribution. But let's wait and see what Dr. Ozerov has to say about it.

Thanks a lot for your help!

Jan Willem
Edited by Jan Willem on 29-07-2018 09:24
Jan Willem van Zuijlen
 
johnes81
#9 Print Post
Posted on 29-07-2018 09:52
User Avatar

Member

Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 1980
Joined: 15.10.16

Hello Jan,

S. hydromyzina is the only one recorded for our area. I don't have the specimen, which complicates the matter for me. The distribution of hairs match S. hydromyzina but the overall appearance is off. Dr. Ozerov has a perfect lateral view, so perhaps it is just a matter of angle and not being dissected. We will see what he has to say. I always dissect genitalia and sometimes it looks completely different after dissection.
John and Nini. Naturalists not experts.
 
Jan Willem
#10 Print Post
Posted on 29-07-2018 16:29
User Avatar

Member

Location: Waalwijk, The Netherlands
Posts: 2169
Joined: 24.07.04

Genitalia:
Jan Willem attached the following image:


[152.89Kb]
Jan Willem van Zuijlen
 
johnes81
#11 Print Post
Posted on 29-07-2018 17:24
User Avatar

Member

Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 1980
Joined: 15.10.16

the dorsal view looks more like S. hydromyzina. Still we need an expert opinion but it is nice that you add a dorsal view.
John and Nini. Naturalists not experts.
 
Jump to Forum:
Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
Spaziphora or Conisternum Fly? Diptera (adults) 5 06-05-2021 14:16
unknown fly from Lapland - Spaziphora hydromyzina Diptera (adults) 5 09-07-2018 08:58
Scathophagidae. >Spaziphora hydromyzina Diptera (adults) 4 07-10-2017 20:48
Sciomyzidae. >Spaziphora hydromyzina male Diptera (adults) 6 18-07-2016 14:04
Scathophagidae - Spaziphora hydromyzina Diptera (adults) 5 04-03-2016 19:24
Date and time
10 April 2026 12:12
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Temporary email?
Due to fact this site has functionality making use of your email address, any registration using a temporary email address will be rejected.

Paul
Donate
Please, help to make
Diptera.info
possible and enable
further improvements!
Latest Articles
Syrph the Net
Those who want to have access to the Syrph the Net database need to sign the
License Agreement -
Click to Download


Public files of Syrph the Net can be downloaded HERE

Last updated: 25.08.2011
Shoutbox
You must login to post a message.

09.04.26 07:19
Wondering if anyone has the following resources: - Revision of the European Empis (s. str.) simulium-group of species (Diptera: Empididae), with descriptions of four new species from the European

20.02.26 13:31
Canada plans to eliminate the Diptera group at the CNC. See post in the News section of the main page.

18.02.26 09:33
Anyone have scans of the Genus Semaranga in: 1)Kanmiya, K. (1983) A systematic study of the Japanese Chloropidae (Diptera). 2) Andersson, H. (1977 Taxonomic and Phylogenetic studies on Chloropid

10.02.26 19:36
Hello Moumoule !

07.01.26 15:52
Pipunculidae from Mongolia! I am looking for specialist who is committed to ID these. There will be a lot of material coming from my expeditions.

06.12.25 21:37
He last posted here in April, identifying some Chloropidae.

04.12.25 20:02
Dr Michael von Tschirnhaus, a leading expert on Chloropidae and Agromyzidae, died on 16 September 2025 at the age of 86. He will be greatly missed by the international community. R.I.P.

03.12.25 12:46
Anyone has the scan of "Harkness, R. D.; Ismay, J. W. 1976: A new species of Trachysiphonella (Dipt., Chloropidae) from Greece, associated with an ant Cataglyphis bicolor (F.) (Hym., Formicidae)

01.12.25 22:29
I will try to fix the messages this month. We have to make some other configuration changes before software goes out of support at end of year.

29.11.25 21:57
I would prefer not to receive any more messages from diptera.info signed by Paul... (Thread reply notification)... Could they be signed by ‘The diptera.info team’?

Render time: 1.96 seconds | 266,677,101 unique visits