Gallery Links
Users Online
· Guests Online: 5

· Members Online: 0

· Total Members: 4,468
· Newest Member: sawge
Forum Threads
Theme Switcher
Switch to:
Last Seen Users
· RamiP00:07:01
· blaauw700:16:57
· Tony Irwin00:24:25
· Jan Maca00:35:31
· Zeegers01:28:40
· albrej01:57:13
· Xespok02:33:16
· binturong05:35:09
· Juergen Peters05:51:59
· runetk06:12:28
Latest Photo Additions
View Thread :: Miscellaneous :: The Lounge
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 Print Thread
subsp,var,f., ...
#1 Print Post
Posted on 27-01-2016 22:46

Location: Slovenia
Posts: 1670
Joined: 14.06.09


Betula alba var. pendula
Betula alba subsp. pendula

I'm thinking to erase all those (var., subsp., ...), they only create confusion.
I have seen online databases that did that, can't pull out of head which.

Opinions ?
Edited by BubikolRamios on 27-01-2016 22:48
highly searchable nature photo galery -->
John Carr
#2 Print Post
Posted on 28-01-2016 04:33
User Avatar


Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 7840
Joined: 22.10.10

Betula is governed by the botanical code, which I do not understand.

Varieties are no longer allowed by the code of zoological nomenclature. Varieties proposed before 1961 may be treated as subspecies.

Subspecies are rarely used for Diptera. Mammalogists, on the other hand, love subspecies. Slovenia is near the intersection of 3 of the 22 subspecies of Sciurus vulgaris -- the central European fuscoater ("a bright red form, with a white venter"), the western Balkan lilaeus ("a generally brownish form"), and Italian alpinus ("an intense russet brown over the dorsum").

I only note subspecies when I consider the difference interesting. For example, 2 of the 21 subspecies of Tamias minimus are colored tan instead of brown to match the color of the ground where they live in the "badlands" of western North America.
#3 Print Post
Posted on 30-01-2016 07:11

Location: Suriname (South America)
Posts: 240
Joined: 21.10.12

I don't know about the botanical rules, but you can find the online zoological rules (the 'International Code for Zoological Nomenclature' or 'ICZN' or simply 'the Code' ) right here.

If you would remove the abbreviation 'var.', you are in fact upgrading the status of the taxon to subspecies.

For example, if you write
Canthon septemmaculatus var. lineatus
you are using an infrasubspecific name (a name denoting a taxonomic level lower than subspecies). Such names are currently not governed by the ICZN.

If you remove 'var.', you get
Canthon septemmaculatus lineatus
which is a subspecific name and thus governed by the ICZN. Any name behind a specific name is automatically a subspecific name, unless it is clearly denoted as a var(iety), ab(beration), f(orma) and so on. See the Code for more details and the correct abbreviations.

I would thus suggest you remove the abbreviation 'subsp.' because it does not add any additional info, but I recommend you leave the other abbreviations in place or remove those infraspecific names (and keeep the example as Canthon septemmaculatus). Of course, varieties can be upgraded tot subspecies, subspecies upgraded to species, abberations synonymized with species etc. etc., and taxonomists may not agree with eachothers views (think e.g. of splitters versus lumpers). You should always best use the most recent literature as well as your own common sense as to which view you adopt.

Keep in mind that most subspecific and infrasubspecific names are used for large and colourful species (butterflies, flower chafers etc.), while 'boring' small brown bugs will almost never get a name beyond specific level, even though their infraspecific genetic variation may be larger. I guess such names have often more to do with aesthetics and profits than with taxonomy.
Edited by Auke on 30-01-2016 07:11
All about the nature of the Guianas: www.guianasnature...
Jump to Forum:
Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
Cyrtopogon fulvicornis subsp. variicornis Asilidae Forum 5 28-06-2017 19:00
Cyrtopogon fulvicornis subsp. variicornis Asilidae Forum 1 28-06-2017 11:58
Nephrotoma (oviposing) from N Spain to ID, please -> N. crocata subsp. luteata ? Diptera (adults) 4 06-01-2016 12:06
subsp. , var., ..... The Lounge 7 30-08-2010 16:09
Date and time
15 July 2020 10:00


Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Temporary email?
Due to fact this site has functionality making use of your email address, any registration using a temporary email address will be rejected.

Please, help to make
possible and enable
further improvements!
Latest Articles
Syrph the Net
Those who want to have access to the Syrph the Net database need to sign the
License Agreement -
Click to Download

Public files of Syrph the Net can be downloaded HERE

Last updated: 25.08.2011
You must login to post a message.

11.07.20 17:55
Hi I seem to have problem posting photos in the forum. Any idea what I'm doing wrong. File size around 200 kB. File extension lower case (.jpg).?

13.06.20 04:50
I am about to become unemployed again, so if anybody knows of a college or university needing an excellent ESL teacher, that would not be put off by the 63 years please let me know. Have net will trav

09.06.20 19:57
128 in the New World as of 2009. Should be around 140 worldwide depending on how you split.

09.06.20 07:19
How many families of flies are currently recognised?

28.04.20 12:00
@Sundew: You may inadvertedly have been caught in the void of the server switch. I hope all is okay now. I am still ironing out any glitches that appear and/or are reported.

28.04.20 11:58
@bioimages: May have been a temporary glitch. I see the new threads with now replies correctly Replies 0.

28.04.20 11:56
@ Volker: There was an error after the server upgrade. Please, try again.

27.04.20 14:43
Where can I change the website in my profile? I don't find anything. thx Volker

27.04.20 12:07
Seems to be a bug: new posts show with 1 reply which makes it look as though it's already been answered.

24.04.20 23:53
All my posts from yesterday evening (that looked good) have disappeared... I'll send them again.

Render time: 3.01 seconds | 145,995,620 unique visits