Gallery Links
Users Online
· Guests Online: 9

· Members Online: 0

· Total Members: 4,842
· Newest Member: raphaelgrellety
Forum Threads
Theme Switcher
Switch to:
Last Seen Users
· guplox< 5 mins
· nowaytofly03:45:52
· Juergen Peters03:59:42
· Nosferatumyia04:39:34
· Chris Cohen04:44:39
· serenense704:50:54
· Arthur van O...05:04:40
· Pietro05:05:44
· smol05:16:48
· Ufo05:24:50
Latest Photo Additions
View Thread :: Miscellaneous :: General queries
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 Print Thread
Auctorum ?
#1 Print Post
Posted on 12-07-2013 20:42

Location: Slovenia
Posts: 1713
Joined: 14.06.09

that is auct. :http://en.wikiped...i/Auctorum

Does that mean: it is valid species name, but something named x auct. is realy y badly named as x, and that (missaplying) is done by many authors ?

Hope that my statement is not even more complicated than that on wiki (-:
Edited by BubikolRamios on 12-07-2013 20:48
highly searchable nature photo galery -->
Paul Beuk
#2 Print Post
Posted on 15-07-2013 09:05
User Avatar

Super Administrator

Location: Netherlands
Posts: 19145
Joined: 11.05.04

In zoology either it is a (commonly used?) misinterepretation or misidentification of a species name:
Musca complexa Linnaeus, 1758 sensu auct.
Musca complexa Linnaeus, 1758 misident. sensu auct.

Misidentification basically means that there is a type (or other material) that can pinpoint the exact identity of the species.
If such material does not exist it truely becomes a matter of interpretation of the description. In that case there can be opposing opinions and than you may have two 'species':
Musca complexa Linnaeus, 1758 sensu Fallén, 1810
Musca complexa Linnaeus, 1758 sensu auct. non Fallén, 1810


- - - -

Paul Beuk on
Jump to Forum:
Date and time
24 March 2023 04:38


Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Temporary email?
Due to fact this site has functionality making use of your email address, any registration using a temporary email address will be rejected.

Please, help to make
possible and enable
further improvements!
Latest Articles
Syrph the Net
Those who want to have access to the Syrph the Net database need to sign the
License Agreement -
Click to Download

Public files of Syrph the Net can be downloaded HERE

Last updated: 25.08.2011
You must login to post a message.

20.03.23 23:47
Hi. Please delete all photos of E. carrapateira I've uploaded. I did not remember that I already had uploaded that species in particular. Except the pallidifacies (this was not present yet). Thank

23.02.23 21:29
Has anyone used the Leica DM500, any comments.

27.12.22 21:10
Thanks, Jan Willem! Much appreciated. Grin

19.12.22 11:33
Thanks Paul for your work on keeping this forum available! Just made a donation via PayPal.

09.10.22 17:07
Yes, dipterologists from far abroad, please buy your copy at veldshop. Stamps will be expensive, but he, the book is unreasonably cheap Smile

07.10.22 11:55
Can any1 help out with a pdf copy of 1941 Hammer. Vidensk. Meddel. Dansk Naturhist. Foren. 105; thank you

05.10.22 19:59
Found! https://www.veldsh

05.10.22 19:53
@zeegers, your book seems difficult to get from Spain, is there another way?

08.09.22 09:29
Ladies and gentlemen https://jeugdbonds

26.08.22 15:06
Lis - This is vol.11 (eleven) and is 346 pages. Sorry, don't have a copy.

Render time: 0.53 seconds | 174,547,795 unique visits