Diptera.info :: Identification queries :: Diptera (adults)
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
|
Coenosia 22-5-11
|
|
| hedy2411 |
Posted on 22-05-2011 20:50
|
|
Member Location: Zeist, Holland Posts: 5242 Joined: 20.11.09 |
Another Coenosia from today. Stephane and Stephen, will you please react to this Coensoia...? hedy2411 attached the following image: ![]() [79.14Kb] |
|
|
|
| Stephen R |
Posted on 23-05-2011 11:42
|
|
Member Location: Clitheroe Lancashire UK Posts: 2396 Joined: 12.06.09 |
Hi Hedy Stephane's opinion is worth much more than mine, but since he is not around... I think all these are consistent with C. testacea, but it's hard to prove the absence of a second proepisternal seta from a photo. Finding a male could be further evidence - see the Gallery. |
|
|
|
| Stephane Lebrun |
Posted on 23-05-2011 19:54
|
|
Member Location: Le Havre, France Posts: 8248 Joined: 03.03.07 |
That's a better answer which I could have formulate.
Edited by Stephane Lebrun on 23-05-2011 19:55 Stephane. |
|
|
|
| hedy2411 |
Posted on 24-05-2011 09:37
|
|
Member Location: Zeist, Holland Posts: 5242 Joined: 20.11.09 |
Here seem to land only ladies... ![]() As I understand well, infact they are all uncertain C. testacea.., then I will put them in our species-list. Thank you for all your comments!! Regards, Hedy Edited by hedy2411 on 24-05-2011 09:38 |
|
|
|
| Jump to Forum: |














Stephane's opinion is worth much more than mine, but since he is not around... I think all these are consistent with C. testacea, but it's hard to prove the absence of a second proepisternal seta from a photo. Finding a male could be further evidence - see the Gallery.