Diptera.info :: Identification queries :: Diptera (adults)
|
Anthomyiidae? - 16/04/2011 > Hylemya?
|
|
| Jeroen K |
Posted on 17-04-2011 12:56
|
|
Member Location: Kapellen, Belgium Posts: 1141 Joined: 03.04.09 |
16/04/2011, my garden, Kapellen, Belgium. ID'able? Thanks in advance!
Jeroen K attached the following image: ![]() [136.37Kb] Edited by Jeroen K on 17-04-2011 19:12 |
|
|
|
| Jeroen K |
Posted on 17-04-2011 12:59
|
|
Member Location: Kapellen, Belgium Posts: 1141 Joined: 03.04.09 |
Picture 2:
Jeroen K attached the following image: ![]() [136.09Kb] |
|
|
|
| Jeroen K |
Posted on 17-04-2011 12:59
|
|
Member Location: Kapellen, Belgium Posts: 1141 Joined: 03.04.09 |
Picture 3:
Jeroen K attached the following image: ![]() [171.33Kb] |
|
|
|
| Stephen R |
Posted on 17-04-2011 14:41
|
|
Member Location: Clitheroe Lancashire UK Posts: 2396 Joined: 12.06.09 |
I'm wondering if it might be something like Phaonia angelicae. I can't see the anal vein clearly reaching the wing edge, and there seems to be a single strong pd on t3. |
|
|
|
| Jeroen K |
Posted on 17-04-2011 16:03
|
|
Member Location: Kapellen, Belgium Posts: 1141 Joined: 03.04.09 |
It doesn't look like P. angelicae to me and as far as I know, it's not a Belgian species, but I'm an absolute amateur. Anyway, thanks for your response! |
|
|
|
| Stephen R |
Posted on 17-04-2011 18:32
|
|
Member Location: Clitheroe Lancashire UK Posts: 2396 Joined: 12.06.09 |
Jeroen K wrote: I'm an absolute amateur. So am I The difference is, you are right and I am wrong. Apart from anything else, P. angelicae should have 2+4 dc.
Edited by Stephen R on 17-04-2011 18:49 |
|
|
|
| Juergen Peters |
Posted on 17-04-2011 18:44
|
|
Member Location: northwest Germany Posts: 14426 Joined: 11.09.04 |
Hello! Jeroen K wrote: It doesn't look like P. angelicae to me and as far as I know, it's not a Belgian species P. angelicae is abundant here in northwest Germany, so I think it should occur in Belgium, too. But not at this time of the year. It is mostly a summer species here, seldom occuring before june. And you're right: it also does not look like P. angelicae. But I can't say, what else it is (also pure amateur...). Best regards, Jürgen -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Juergen Peters Borgholzhausen, Germany WWW: http://insektenfo... -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= |
| Stephen R |
Posted on 17-04-2011 18:55
|
|
Member Location: Clitheroe Lancashire UK Posts: 2396 Joined: 12.06.09 |
I've just seen the rest of the bristles in the first photo (right hind tibia) I think it must be Hylemya after all. That's what comes from looking at the bristles and not the fly
Edited by Stephen R on 17-04-2011 18:57 |
|
|
|
| Jeroen K |
Posted on 17-04-2011 19:09
|
|
Member Location: Kapellen, Belgium Posts: 1141 Joined: 03.04.09 |
Thanks Stephen and Juergen. I'll add 'Hylemya' to the title to attract some experts (Joke, where are you?)... |
|
|
|
| nielsyese |
Posted on 18-04-2011 20:30
|
|
Member Location: Yerseke, NL Posts: 2383 Joined: 13.02.09 |
My thought would be Hylemya too. It is at least Anthomyiidae![]() |
|
|
|
| Jeroen K |
Posted on 06-08-2011 09:56
|
|
Member Location: Kapellen, Belgium Posts: 1141 Joined: 03.04.09 |
Closer ID than Hylemya possible? |
|
|
|
| Jump to Forum: |
















The difference is, you are right and I am wrong. Apart from anything else, P. angelicae should have 2+4 dc.

I think it must be Hylemya after all. That's what comes from looking at the bristles and not the fly
