Diptera.info :: Identification queries :: Other insects, spiders, etc.
 Several monsters :)
|
|
| boldav |
Posted on 24-05-2005 22:18
|
|
Member Location: France Posts: 21 Joined: 06.05.05 |
    Thank you for your help !! P.S : is the last one a hymenoptera ? |
 |
|
| Paul Beuk |
Posted on 25-05-2005 07:39
|
 Super Administrator Location: Netherlands Posts: 19403 Joined: 11.05.04 |
1. Possibly Misumena viatica, Thomisidae (crab spiders). 2. Possibly a Xysticus species, also Thomisidae (crab spiders). 3. Ach, yes, a weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), what can I say. Way out of my league. 4. Indeed Hymenoptera, family Chrysididae, cuckoo wasps. Paul - - - - Paul Beuk on https://diptera.info |
|
|
|
| SylvainF |
Posted on 25-05-2005 16:59
|
 Member Location: Marseille Posts: 4 Joined: 11.05.05 |
Hello For the weevil, it seems to be a Ceuthorhynchus... |
|
|
|
| Xespok |
Posted on 25-05-2005 17:06
|
 Member Location: Debrecen, Hungary Posts: 5551 Joined: 02.03.05 |
Paul Beuk wrote: 1. Possibly Misumena viatica, Thomisidae (crab spiders). 2. Possibly a Xysticus species, also Thomisidae (crab spiders). 3. Ach, yes, a weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), what can I say. Way out of my league. 4. Indeed Hymenoptera, family Chrysididae, cuckoo wasps. I wonder if you wanted to write Misumena vatia? |
|
|
|
| Juergen Peters |
Posted on 25-05-2005 20:52
|
 Member Location: northwest Germany Posts: 14248 Joined: 11.09.04 |
HEllo! Paul Beuk wrote: 1. Possibly Misumena viatica, Thomisidae (crab spiders). This possibility is a reality :-), no species to confuse with. 2. Possibly a Xysticus species, also Thomisidae (crab spiders). This is a Philodromus (most likely P. cespitum). The family Philodromidae (running spiders) is often confused with crab spiders, because their posture and movements are often similar. But in Philodromidae the leg pairs one and two are not as much enlarged as in Thomisidae. Also they do not have such a triangular shaped opisthosoma (abdomen), ist is more oval. 3. Ach, yes, a weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), what can I say. Way out of my league. As SylvainF wrote, this could be a Ceutorhynchus, but most of those species do not have such deep furrows on the elythrae. I think without a look from above and knowing the food plant one cannot identify this weevil from the photo. There are some other genera with look-alikes: Glocianus, Mogulones. Nedyus, Parathelcus, Rhinoncus (maybe more). Best regards, Jürgen -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Juergen Peters Borgholzhausen, Germany WWW: http://insektenfo... -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= |
|
|
|
| Paul Beuk |
Posted on 26-05-2005 07:56
|
|
Super Administrator Location: Netherlands Posts: 19403 Joined: 11.05.04 |
Xespok wrote: I wonder if you wanted to write Misumena vatia? Yes, I did! I was looking with a crooked eye. 
Paul - - - - Paul Beuk on https://diptera.info |
|
|
|
| boldav |
Posted on 26-05-2005 21:34
|
|
Member Location: France Posts: 21 Joined: 06.05.05 |
Thank you so much |
|
|
|
| Jump to Forum: |