Diptera.info :: Identification queries :: Diptera (adults)
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 Tachina? -> Peleteria prompta
|
|
| Michael Becker |
Posted on 29-01-2009 17:03
|
|
Member Location: Germany, Neuss Posts: 1268 Joined: 16.01.07 |
Hello, this tachinid is from july from the alps on about 2000m height. Is was about 1cm long. What fly is it? Perhaps some Tachina species? Or a Nowickia species? Thanks, Michael Michael Becker attached the following image:  [68.46Kb] Edited by Michael Becker on 30-01-2009 20:03 |
|
|
|
| Zeegers |
Posted on 29-01-2009 20:35
|
|
Member Location: Soest, NL Posts: 19011 Joined: 21.07.04 |
Well, more llike 15 mm. or larger. It is a Nowickia or a Peleteria. In both genera there are strong hilltoppers (N. reducta, P. prompta). First impression is Nowickia, however, the abdominal pattern does not look familiar. Theo |
|
|
|
| Michael Becker |
Posted on 30-01-2009 11:55
|
|
Member Location: Germany, Neuss Posts: 1268 Joined: 16.01.07 |
Hello, thanks for your answer. I have changed the subject, so perhaps we can catch attention of someone who specialized in Nowickia species ;-) Michael |
|
|
|
| ChrisR |
Posted on 30-01-2009 12:15
|
 Super Administrator Location: Reading, England Posts: 7703 Joined: 12.07.04 |
I think the problem is that we have artificially high contrast caused by the dark fly sitting on a pale stone in bright sunlight. I have put it into PhotoShop and played with the levels to bring out any more detail in the abdomen and the wide black mark on T4 becomes much narrower on T5 and there is clearly more orange on the sides of T5. Not sure if that helps  |
 |
|
| Zeegers |
Posted on 30-01-2009 17:56
|
|
Member Location: Soest, NL Posts: 19011 Joined: 21.07.04 |
so I change my opinion in favour of Peleteria prompta. You can see marginal bristles present on syntergite 1&2. In Nowickia, that would imply marklini. However, marklini males have the vertex much narrower. So it can't be Nowickia. Moreover, it agrees with males prompta in my collection. You can't see the Peleteria-bristles, but this might very well be due to the angle. Theo |
|
|
|
| Michael Becker |
Posted on 30-01-2009 20:03
|
|
Member Location: Germany, Neuss Posts: 1268 Joined: 16.01.07 |
Hello Chris, hello Zeegers, thank you for your efforts. I have to admit that I can't really see the bristles or the narrowness or wideness of the marks on T4 and T5. Do you thing Peleteria prompta is sure enough for the gallery? This species seems to lack there. Michael |
|
|
|
| Zeegers |
Posted on 31-01-2009 09:32
|
|
Member Location: Soest, NL Posts: 19011 Joined: 21.07.04 |
I'm 95 % sure. Peleteria prompta is only seen hilltopping, therefore, rather difficult to get. If this was at a very hilltop, that would greatly support the ID. Theo |
|
|
|
| Michael Becker |
Posted on 31-01-2009 11:04
|
|
Member Location: Germany, Neuss Posts: 1268 Joined: 16.01.07 |
If this was at a very hilltop, that would greatly support the ID. It was a ridge with nearly the same height as the sorrounding peaks (about 50 or 100m lower), definitively not a valley or a slope. I think, this place would support P. prompta. Greeting, Michael |
|
|
|
| Zeegers |
Posted on 31-01-2009 18:12
|
|
Member Location: Soest, NL Posts: 19011 Joined: 21.07.04 |
Yes, it does. All is well that ends well. Theo |
|
|
|
| Jump to Forum: |