Gallery Links
Users Online
· Guests Online: 32

· Members Online: 0

· Total Members: 5,072
· Newest Member: Topopa
Forum Threads
Theme Switcher
Switch to:
Last Seen Users
· Jordi Clavell00:11:28
· Juergen Peters00:29:57
· Jan Maca03:20:40
· Nosferatumyia04:35:06
· DPD04:45:49
· Alvesgaspar06:44:02
· kporter08:21:03
· evdb08:38:48
· weia10:12:00
· NakaRB10:40:47
Latest Photo Additions
View Thread
Diptera.info :: Identification queries :: Diptera (adults)
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 Print Thread
Chironominae Scale & Spur
Tim Jaeger
#1 Print Post
Posted on 17-10-2023 23:23
Member

Location:
Posts: 16
Joined: 17.10.23

Hi

I'm currently using the Key "Chironomidae of the Holarctic region. Keys and diagnoses. Part 3. Adult Males" by Wiederholm to identify Chironominae.

And I'm struggling with two of the following steps in the key:

" 32. Apex of fore tibia truncate with at most shallow scale lacking spur -> 33
Apex of fore tibia with well-developed scale and/or spur -> 35 "

and

"35. Apex of fore tibia with black spur similar to those on mid and hind tibia. Pars ventralis present. ->Pseudochironomus
Apex of fore tibia without spure but with scale, often bearing spine. Pars ventralis absent -> 36"

I'm not sure how a "shallow" scale is locking compared to a "well-developed" scale or how a well-developed spur looks like.


So if someone has any pictures or figures that would be really helpful!


I have attached a photo of what I believe to be a well developed scale but as I said I am unsure.
Tim Jaeger attached the following image:


[254.97Kb]
Edited by Tim Jaeger on 17-10-2023 23:25
 
John Carr
#2 Print Post
Posted on 18-10-2023 14:06
User Avatar

Super Administrator

Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 10546
Joined: 22.10.10

No spur. Pseudochironomus also has a low leg ratio and widely spaced eyes.
John Carr attached the following image:


[33.28Kb]
 
http://www.flickr.com/photos/31715949@N00
John Carr
#3 Print Post
Posted on 18-10-2023 14:08
User Avatar

Super Administrator

Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 10546
Joined: 22.10.10

Paratendipes
John Carr attached the following image:


[34.16Kb]
 
http://www.flickr.com/photos/31715949@N00
John Carr
#4 Print Post
Posted on 18-10-2023 14:09
User Avatar

Super Administrator

Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 10546
Joined: 22.10.10

Chironomus
John Carr attached the following image:


[29.13Kb]
 
http://www.flickr.com/photos/31715949@N00
Tim Jaeger
#5 Print Post
Posted on 18-10-2023 20:08
Member

Location:
Posts: 16
Joined: 17.10.23

John Carr wrote:
Chironomus


Thank you for the fast reply!

Is this a shallow scale and does Tendipes refer to Microtendipes here?

Since Chironomus branches off before step 32 in my key, I don't know if they have a developed or shallow scale.

Would you identify my photo as shallow scale?
Edited by Tim Jaeger on 18-10-2023 20:09
 
Tim Jaeger
#6 Print Post
Posted on 18-10-2023 20:18
Member

Location:
Posts: 16
Joined: 17.10.23

John Carr wrote:
No spur. Pseudochironomus also has a low leg ratio and widely spaced eyes.



From which guide did you get the picture?
Because to me it also looks like a scale with a spine but in the book, I use it explicitly lists in step 35 a black spur as a criterion for Pseudochironomus.
So that's why I'm a little bit confused.
 
John Carr
#7 Print Post
Posted on 18-10-2023 20:24
User Avatar

Super Administrator

Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 10546
Joined: 22.10.10

Tim Jaeger wrote:
John Carr wrote:
Chironomus


Thank you for the fast reply!

Is this a shallow scale and does Tendipes refer to Microtendipes here?

Since Chironomus branches off before step 32 in my key, I don't know if they have a developed or shallow scale.

Would you identify my photo as shallow scale?


My guess is shallow, but that is subjective and I am unsure.

Tendipes is an old name for Chironomus. The dispute over the correct name lasted from 1908 to 1963 and was resolved only by a formal decision of the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature. Search on "Meigen 1800 names" for the full history.
 
http://www.flickr.com/photos/31715949@N00
John Carr
#8 Print Post
Posted on 18-10-2023 20:32
User Avatar

Super Administrator

Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 10546
Joined: 22.10.10

The illustrations come from

Townes, H. K. Jr. 1945. The Nearctic species of Tendipedini [Diptera, Tendipedidae (= Chironomidae)]. American Midland Naturalist 34:1–206

They were reprinted in 1952 in

Guide to the Insects of Connecticut, Part VI. The Diptera or True Flies of Connecticut, Fifth Fascicle: Midges and Gnats.
 
http://www.flickr.com/photos/31715949@N00
Tim Jaeger
#9 Print Post
Posted on 20-10-2023 20:20
Member

Location:
Posts: 16
Joined: 17.10.23

John Carr wrote:
The illustrations come from

Townes, H. K. Jr. 1945. The Nearctic species of Tendipedini [Diptera, Tendipedidae (= Chironomidae)]. American Midland Naturalist 34:1–206

They were reprinted in 1952 in

Guide to the Insects of Connecticut, Part VI. The Diptera or True Flies of Connecticut, Fifth Fascicle: Midges and Gnats.


John do you know when it comes to Polypedilum if all of the species have a fringed Squama? In the illustrations I have the wing is showing a fringed one.

Because then I could use this trait (+others) instead of the scale (which is vaguer to me) to identify the genera that are important to me.
Tim Jaeger attached the following image:


[154.75Kb]
 
John Carr
#10 Print Post
Posted on 20-10-2023 22:10
User Avatar

Super Administrator

Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 10546
Joined: 22.10.10

I use the shape of tergite 8 to distinguish Polypedilum from other Chironomini.
 
http://www.flickr.com/photos/31715949@N00
Tim Jaeger
#11 Print Post
Posted on 26-10-2023 21:35
Member

Location:
Posts: 16
Joined: 17.10.23

John Carr wrote:
I use the shape of tergite 8 to distinguish Polypedilum from other Chironomini.


It would be more anteriorly tapered compared to other Chironomini right?
Edited by Tim Jaeger on 26-10-2023 21:37
 
Tim Jaeger
#12 Print Post
Posted on 26-10-2023 21:38
Member

Location:
Posts: 16
Joined: 17.10.23

Tim Jaeger wrote:
John Carr wrote:
I use the shape of tergite 8 to distinguish Polypedilum from other Chironomini.


It would be more anteriorly tapered compared to other Chironomini right?

Edited by Tim Jaeger on 26-10-2023 21:39
 
John Carr
#13 Print Post
Posted on 26-10-2023 21:58
User Avatar

Super Administrator

Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 10546
Joined: 22.10.10

Tim Jaeger wrote:
John Carr wrote:
I use the shape of tergite 8 to distinguish Polypedilum from other Chironomini.


It would be more anteriorly tapered compared to other Chironomini right?


Right.
 
http://www.flickr.com/photos/31715949@N00
Jump to Forum:
Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
Chironominae?->Polypedilum (Pentapedilum)? Diptera (adults) 3 01-12-2025 19:15
Chironominae Tanytarsini Diptera (adults) 6 22-10-2025 19:03
Fly ID. -> Chironominae. Diptera (adults) 3 09-09-2025 10:01
Chironominae?->Chironomini Diptera (adults) 3 29-06-2025 09:42
Chironominae? Diptera (adults) 3 06-04-2025 19:32
Date and time
13 December 2025 08:10
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Temporary email?
Due to fact this site has functionality making use of your email address, any registration using a temporary email address will be rejected.

Paul
Donate
Please, help to make
Diptera.info
possible and enable
further improvements!
Latest Articles
Syrph the Net
Those who want to have access to the Syrph the Net database need to sign the
License Agreement -
Click to Download


Public files of Syrph the Net can be downloaded HERE

Last updated: 25.08.2011
Shoutbox
You must login to post a message.

06.12.25 21:37
He last posted here in April, identifying some Chloropidae.

04.12.25 20:02
Dr Michael von Tschirnhaus, a leading expert on Chloropidae and Agromyzidae, died on 16 September 2025 at the age of 86. He will be greatly missed by the international community. R.I.P.

03.12.25 12:46
Anyone has the scan of "Harkness, R. D.; Ismay, J. W. 1976: A new species of Trachysiphonella (Dipt., Chloropidae) from Greece, associated with an ant Cataglyphis bicolor (F.) (Hym., Formicidae)

01.12.25 22:29
I will try to fix the messages this month. We have to make some other configuration changes before software goes out of support at end of year.

29.11.25 21:57
I would prefer not to receive any more messages from diptera.info signed by Paul... (Thread reply notification)... Could they be signed by ‘The diptera.info team’?

19.11.25 12:31
It is with deepest sadness in my heart that I announce that on Saturday, November 15, one of the great minds of world dipterology, prof. Rudolf Rozkošny, left us forever. Please remember him with a

15.08.25 10:15
For those specialists not active on Facebook, I just ask to consider to join our group on FB. Please, be aware that it is not necessary at all to be active on FB outside the diptera group. Actually, n

15.08.25 10:13
We received requests to get permission to ask for ID in our Facebook group, https://www.facebo
ok.com/groups/1798
95332035235/ Until now we pointed to diptera.info, but since Paul's passing we not

23.06.25 18:10
If you have some spare money, there is a copy (together with keys to pupae and larvae) for sale by Hermann L. Strack, Loguivy Plougras, France

23.06.25 11:18
Appreciate it, Tony Irwin! I got the hint to use the key next to Langton and Pinder key for females of Chironomidae. So no specific queries, except the keys... I will keep this on my list and hope th

Render time: 1.50 seconds | 251,793,707 unique visits