Gallery Links
Users Online
· Guests Online: 39

· Members Online: 0

· Total Members: 5,074
· Newest Member: Johann55
Forum Threads
Theme Switcher
Switch to:
Last Seen Users
· nichilme02:08:09
· John Carr04:18:26
· Juergen Peters06:46:55
· weia07:03:30
· smol07:45:33
· evdb08:02:55
· piros11:46:05
· libor11:47:29
· Jordi Clavell11:59:48
· Oryctes13:08:13
Latest Photo Additions
View Thread
Diptera.info :: Identification queries :: Diptera (adults)
 Print Thread
Phaonia fuscata, Muscidae, Hungary, May 2007
Xespok
#1 Print Post
Posted on 05-01-2008 17:56
User Avatar

Member

Location: Debrecen, Hungary
Posts: 5551
Joined: 02.03.05

The female.
Xespok attached the following image:


[93.4Kb]
Edited by Xespok on 11-01-2008 21:27
Gabor Keresztes

Japan Wildlife Gallery
Carpathian Basin Wildlife Gallery
 
Teglagyar u. 30.
Xespok
#2 Print Post
Posted on 05-01-2008 17:57
User Avatar

Member

Location: Debrecen, Hungary
Posts: 5551
Joined: 02.03.05

Another view.
Xespok attached the following image:


[101.9Kb]
Gabor Keresztes

Japan Wildlife Gallery
Carpathian Basin Wildlife Gallery
 
Teglagyar u. 30.
Xespok
#3 Print Post
Posted on 05-01-2008 17:57
User Avatar

Member

Location: Debrecen, Hungary
Posts: 5551
Joined: 02.03.05

The male at the same location.
Xespok attached the following image:


[93.84Kb]
Gabor Keresztes

Japan Wildlife Gallery
Carpathian Basin Wildlife Gallery
 
Teglagyar u. 30.
Xespok
#4 Print Post
Posted on 05-01-2008 18:01
User Avatar

Member

Location: Debrecen, Hungary
Posts: 5551
Joined: 02.03.05

Another male.
Xespok attached the following image:


[115.12Kb]
Gabor Keresztes

Japan Wildlife Gallery
Carpathian Basin Wildlife Gallery
 
Teglagyar u. 30.
Stephane Lebrun
#5 Print Post
Posted on 05-01-2008 18:17
User Avatar

Member

Location: Le Havre, France
Posts: 8248
Joined: 03.03.07

The cross-veins are not so infuscated, but I think they are male and female of Phaonia fuscata.
Stephane.
 
Xespok
#6 Print Post
Posted on 05-01-2008 19:06
User Avatar

Member

Location: Debrecen, Hungary
Posts: 5551
Joined: 02.03.05

They certainly look like P. fuscata at galerie-inssecte.org.

Should this species have not a plumose arista? In my images this is not visible, but the plumosity often is quite difficult to judge

Otherwise the description fits well, except the strength of the infuscation as noted by you.

But this means that a Ph. fuscata determined earlier by Nikita can not be right.
Gabor Keresztes

Japan Wildlife Gallery
Carpathian Basin Wildlife Gallery
 
Teglagyar u. 30.
Stephane Lebrun
#7 Print Post
Posted on 06-01-2008 00:18
User Avatar

Member

Location: Le Havre, France
Posts: 8248
Joined: 03.03.07

The poor quality linked picture is mine. It's a collected and in due form identified specimen.
However, it doesn't mean your flies do are the same species. On photographs, some details cannot be checked, like fine pilosity of notopleuron and other characters.
I'm pretty sure of the male ; all seems correct : long legs, frons width, chaetotaxy of scutum, even the typical middle row of triangular spots on abdomen...and typically found like this on tree barks.
I am more doubting about the female, because the crossveins should be more shaded.
Edited by Stephane Lebrun on 06-01-2008 00:19
Stephane.
 
Xespok
#8 Print Post
Posted on 06-01-2008 16:15
User Avatar

Member

Location: Debrecen, Hungary
Posts: 5551
Joined: 02.03.05

I think my images show one species. Several males and females were active on some tree trunks at the time of the photo. I should have the collected specimens as well, if I ever will be able to get my collection sorted out. (I hope to improve in maintaining my collection this year, I learnt a lot of things what and how not to do in the first year.)

Furthermore I think your image and my images (not all of them posted here) show the same species. I do not generally think that there are many very similar flies that would key out at completely different locations.

My impression is that the various Phaonia flies are not very similar to each other, probably not more similar than for example bird species within a genus. Many of the characteristics get however lost in stored specimens. In fact the best field characterstics seem to get lost. Colors tend to fade and darken, the stance of the fly may not be retained etc. Therefore existing keys rely on some stable but relatively insignificant characteristics, such as the number of setae on varius veins, etc.

Look up a key for some passerine bird genera from the 19th century, you'll realize what I talk about. Birds that are sometimes very easy to recognize are separated by keys that are very difficult to use even by experienced birders.


Gabor Keresztes

Japan Wildlife Gallery
Carpathian Basin Wildlife Gallery
 
Teglagyar u. 30.
Jump to Forum:
Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
Muscidae > Polietes domitor Diptera (adults) 6 11-12-2025 22:05
Phaonia pallida, Muscidae Diptera (adults) 3 10-12-2025 17:59
Muscidae - Spilogona sp. Diptera (adults) 8 01-12-2025 11:18
Phaonia sp.? --> Pollenia sp. (female) Diptera (adults) 7 24-11-2025 08:47
Phaonia pallida, male (18.05.2020) -- Pegomya testacea, male Diptera (adults) 4 24-11-2025 08:07
Date and time
14 December 2025 07:37
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Temporary email?
Due to fact this site has functionality making use of your email address, any registration using a temporary email address will be rejected.

Paul
Donate
Please, help to make
Diptera.info
possible and enable
further improvements!
Latest Articles
Syrph the Net
Those who want to have access to the Syrph the Net database need to sign the
License Agreement -
Click to Download


Public files of Syrph the Net can be downloaded HERE

Last updated: 25.08.2011
Shoutbox
You must login to post a message.

06.12.25 21:37
He last posted here in April, identifying some Chloropidae.

04.12.25 20:02
Dr Michael von Tschirnhaus, a leading expert on Chloropidae and Agromyzidae, died on 16 September 2025 at the age of 86. He will be greatly missed by the international community. R.I.P.

03.12.25 12:46
Anyone has the scan of "Harkness, R. D.; Ismay, J. W. 1976: A new species of Trachysiphonella (Dipt., Chloropidae) from Greece, associated with an ant Cataglyphis bicolor (F.) (Hym., Formicidae)

01.12.25 22:29
I will try to fix the messages this month. We have to make some other configuration changes before software goes out of support at end of year.

29.11.25 21:57
I would prefer not to receive any more messages from diptera.info signed by Paul... (Thread reply notification)... Could they be signed by ‘The diptera.info team’?

19.11.25 12:31
It is with deepest sadness in my heart that I announce that on Saturday, November 15, one of the great minds of world dipterology, prof. Rudolf Rozkošny, left us forever. Please remember him with a

15.08.25 10:15
For those specialists not active on Facebook, I just ask to consider to join our group on FB. Please, be aware that it is not necessary at all to be active on FB outside the diptera group. Actually, n

15.08.25 10:13
We received requests to get permission to ask for ID in our Facebook group, https://www.facebo
ok.com/groups/1798
95332035235/ Until now we pointed to diptera.info, but since Paul's passing we not

23.06.25 18:10
If you have some spare money, there is a copy (together with keys to pupae and larvae) for sale by Hermann L. Strack, Loguivy Plougras, France

23.06.25 11:18
Appreciate it, Tony Irwin! I got the hint to use the key next to Langton and Pinder key for females of Chironomidae. So no specific queries, except the keys... I will keep this on my list and hope th

Render time: 1.65 seconds | 251,899,360 unique visits