Gallery Links
Users Online
· Guests Online: 31

· Members Online: 0

· Total Members: 5,061
· Newest Member: Ivan Solodkii
Forum Threads
Theme Switcher
Switch to:
Last Seen Users
· eklans< 5 mins
· weia00:10:31
· John Carr00:15:21
· Nosferatumyia00:23:44
· Zeegers00:39:56
· Carnifex01:19:48
· karl701:53:06
· Jan Maca02:06:12
· Volker02:38:12
· pierred02:39:22
Latest Photo Additions
View Thread
Diptera.info :: Identification queries :: Diptera (adults)
 Print Thread
Calliphoridae: ♀ Onesia cf. floralis
eklans
#1 Print Post
Posted on 14-10-2021 12:57
Member

Location: Franconia, Germany
Posts: 4185
Joined: 11.11.18

Hi, I've found this fly on my housewall (Ansbach, DE-Franconia, close to Frankenhoehe Nature Park, old deciduous forest) on 2021-10-12.
I think it is Onesia floralis (sepulcralis): R5 open and 0, 3 ia.
Thank you for your comments!
eklans attached the following image:


[46.48Kb]
Edited by eklans on 18-10-2021 08:58
Greetings, Eric K
 
Zeegers
#2 Print Post
Posted on 15-10-2021 11:38
Member

Location: Soest, NL
Posts: 19146
Joined: 21.07.04

Yes, looks like Onesia. I would not dare to separate the two species.

Theo
 
eklans
#3 Print Post
Posted on 15-10-2021 11:55
Member

Location: Franconia, Germany
Posts: 4185
Joined: 11.11.18

Thank you very much Theo!
But are floralis & sepulcralis different species?
fauna-eu call Musca s. as a synonym of O. floralis.
H. Schumann's "Revision der Gattung Onesia..." names 6 species:
O. sepulcralis, austriaca, canescens... and floralis as a synonym of sepulcralis. I could not find a source with sepulcralis and floralis as separate species. Frown
Greetings, Eric K
 
Zeegers
#4 Print Post
Posted on 15-10-2021 14:37
Member

Location: Soest, NL
Posts: 19146
Joined: 21.07.04

I meant floralis and austriaca.
Apparently, you also might have kowarzi and zumpti, I wasn’t aware of that. So even more, I wouldn’t dare to make the call.

Theo
 
eklans
#5 Print Post
Posted on 15-10-2021 15:32
Member

Location: Franconia, Germany
Posts: 4185
Joined: 11.11.18

Sorry for being tenacious, but Schumann also added a key and the female of his sepulcralis is the only on to have no pre ia. Also the wings of the other ones look quite different (if in some cases a small ia is present).
Greetings, Eric K
 
Zeegers
#6 Print Post
Posted on 16-10-2021 08:46
Member

Location: Soest, NL
Posts: 19146
Joined: 21.07.04

I don’t have Schumann, if you could share a PDF, please send a pm.
The species called sepulcralis by Schumann is called floralis by most modern authors. I don’t know why, check Rognes, but it is a technical matter.
As for the other species, I have no experience with them, somI hold my ground “ I would not dare to make the call”. But separating females based on the presence or absence of a tiny prae IA seems an unwise thing to do to me, unless you really know what you are doing. As said, I don’t Smile
 
eklans
#7 Print Post
Posted on 16-10-2021 09:24
Member

Location: Franconia, Germany
Posts: 4185
Joined: 11.11.18

Hi Theo, pm sent.
Of course you are right, that the prae IA alone is not enough to determine (and Schumann writes, that in rare cases austriace et al could be without it, too) - but in combination with the wing venation it seems to be practical. The wings are shown in Schumann's key, too.
Greetings, Eric K
 
Zeegers
#8 Print Post
Posted on 18-10-2021 07:19
Member

Location: Soest, NL
Posts: 19146
Joined: 21.07.04

So, I checked all my Onesia from one locality in Austria:

* based on male genitalia: all are floralis / sepulchralis
* vertex can be narrow or broader
* prae IA can be absent, hairlike or present.

In other words: Schumann's external features are unreliable already in these 10 specimens. Now I know what I am doing, I would not rely on them.

Theo
 
eklans
#9 Print Post
Posted on 18-10-2021 09:03
Member

Location: Franconia, Germany
Posts: 4185
Joined: 11.11.18

Hi Theo, thank you very much for your efforts!
What do you think of Schumann's feature wing venation? Is this variable, too?
eklans attached the following image:


[49.93Kb]
Edited by eklans on 18-10-2021 09:25
Greetings, Eric K
 
Zeegers
#10 Print Post
Posted on 18-10-2021 18:46
Member

Location: Soest, NL
Posts: 19146
Joined: 21.07.04

I don’t think you can separate austriaca from floralis in this way. The other species are extremely rare, I don’t know


Theo
 
Zeegers
#11 Print Post
Posted on 18-10-2021 18:49
Member

Location: Soest, NL
Posts: 19146
Joined: 21.07.04

Of course, Schumann isn’t making things up, the tendencies are there. But 80 % reliability is not reliable at an individual level.

I am sorry, I wished it worked better, since extrracting male genitalia is extremely difficult in Onesia.

Theo
 
eklans
#12 Print Post
Posted on 18-10-2021 19:48
Member

Location: Franconia, Germany
Posts: 4185
Joined: 11.11.18

No problem, Theo, and thanks again for your explanations. I'll leave it as cf. floralis and hope to find more Onesia (and Bellardias).
Greetings, Eric K
 
Jump to Forum:
Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
Calliphora vicina/ Onesia sp.? --> cf. Bellardia sp. Diptera (adults) 9 05-09-2025 11:46
Tachinidae - Nemorilla floralis, female Diptera (adults) 7 22-08-2025 20:21
Calliphoridae: Pollenia griseotomentosa ? (female) => Pollenia rudis (female) Diptera (adults) 13 18-08-2025 19:46
Calliphoridae, Sarcophagidae, Tachinidae, Rhinophoridae? Diptera (adults) 4 25-05-2025 07:34
Calliphoridae = >Calliphora vicina Diptera (adults) 5 22-03-2025 15:32
Date and time
18 September 2025 13:26
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Temporary email?
Due to fact this site has functionality making use of your email address, any registration using a temporary email address will be rejected.

Paul
Donate
Please, help to make
Diptera.info
possible and enable
further improvements!
Latest Articles
Syrph the Net
Those who want to have access to the Syrph the Net database need to sign the
License Agreement -
Click to Download


Public files of Syrph the Net can be downloaded HERE

Last updated: 25.08.2011
Shoutbox
You must login to post a message.

08.09.25 16:17
Anyone has this article'A REVISION OF SPECIES OF THE GENUS CADREMA WALKER (DIPTERA, CHLOROPIDAE) FROM ISLANDS IN THE INDIAN OCEAN'? Smile

24.08.25 16:55
Thanks for your proposal, but for me this option is ineligible.

15.08.25 10:15
For those specialists not active on Facebook, I just ask to consider to join our group on FB. Please, be aware that it is not necessary at all to be active on FB outside the diptera group. Actually, n

15.08.25 10:13
We received requests to get permission to ask for ID in our Facebook group, https://www.facebo
ok.com/groups/1798
95332035235/ Until now we pointed to diptera.info, but since Paul's passing we not

23.06.25 18:10
If you have some spare money, there is a copy (together with keys to pupae and larvae) for sale by Hermann L. Strack, Loguivy Plougras, France

23.06.25 11:18
Appreciate it, Tony Irwin! I got the hint to use the key next to Langton and Pinder key for females of Chironomidae. So no specific queries, except the keys... I will keep this on my list and hope th

19.06.25 15:33
I have the hard copy book, if you have any specific queries, but I'm not scanning the 500+ pages!

02.06.25 18:26
Anyone has "Chironomidae of the Holarctic region. Keys and diagnoses. Part 3. Adult Males Entomologica Scandinavica Supplement 34"? smolwaarneming@gma
il.com

28.05.25 20:57
I have Russian Coenosia. nikita6510@ya.ru

28.05.25 12:25
Is someone able to share with me "A key to the Russian species of the genus Coenosia"?

Render time: 1.33 seconds | 240,962,347 unique visits