Diptera.info :: Identification queries :: Diptera (adults)
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 Anthomyiidae?? (England, July)-> Paregle audacula (male)
|
|
| Martin Cooper |
Posted on 24-09-2014 19:04
|
|
Member Location: Ipswich, Suffolk Posts: 628 Joined: 01.05.12 |
Fly taken 9 July 2014 in Suffolk.
Martin Cooper attached the following image:  [144.53Kb] Edited by Martin Cooper on 27-09-2014 22:17 |
|
|
|
| Martin Cooper |
Posted on 24-09-2014 19:05
|
|
Member Location: Ipswich, Suffolk Posts: 628 Joined: 01.05.12 |
.
Martin Cooper attached the following image:  [139.46Kb] |
|
|
|
| Martin Cooper |
Posted on 24-09-2014 19:05
|
|
Member Location: Ipswich, Suffolk Posts: 628 Joined: 01.05.12 |
.
Martin Cooper attached the following image:  [145.18Kb] |
|
|
|
| Martin Cooper |
Posted on 24-09-2014 19:06
|
|
Member Location: Ipswich, Suffolk Posts: 628 Joined: 01.05.12 |
.
Martin Cooper attached the following image:  [142.48Kb] |
|
|
|
| Martin Cooper |
Posted on 24-09-2014 19:09
|
|
Member Location: Ipswich, Suffolk Posts: 628 Joined: 01.05.12 |
While I saw studying the fly, its right-hand rear leg became detached. Here is a shot showing it from behind and from in front. I have great difficult working out which setae are which! Best wishes, Martin Martin Cooper attached the following image:  [139.43Kb] |
|
|
|
| javanerkelens |
Posted on 24-09-2014 21:48
|
 Member Location: Netherlands Posts: 2962 Joined: 18.10.07 |
I think Paregle audacula: Notopleuron area haired Very small orbitals present One stronger presutural acrostichal followed by rows of finer hairs Long and small proboscis To confirm for 100 % ID, a better look on the genitals is needed. But I am almost convinced this must be P. audacula. Johanna |
|
|
|
| javanerkelens |
Posted on 24-09-2014 22:09
|
|
Member Location: Netherlands Posts: 2962 Joined: 18.10.07 |
Overview of the legs chaetotaxy...(sorry...a bit large  )
javanerkelens attached the following image:  [67.04Kb] Edited by javanerkelens on 24-09-2014 22:10 |
|
|
|
| javanerkelens |
Posted on 24-09-2014 22:10
|
|
Member Location: Netherlands Posts: 2962 Joined: 18.10.07 |
another view
javanerkelens attached the following image:  [72.19Kb] |
|
|
|
| Martin Cooper |
Posted on 24-09-2014 22:49
|
|
Member Location: Ipswich, Suffolk Posts: 628 Joined: 01.05.12 |
Thanks Johanna. I've saved a copy of the chaetotaxy drawings to study. I'll have a closer look at the genitals and if possible post some photos of them. |
|
|
|
| Martin Cooper |
Posted on 27-09-2014 00:21
|
|
Member Location: Ipswich, Suffolk Posts: 628 Joined: 01.05.12 |
I've redone some images covering the features mentioned already... Side thorax including notopleuron, though I think part of it may be obscured by the blurred end of the pin. Martin Cooper attached the following image:  [141.99Kb] Edited by Martin Cooper on 27-09-2014 00:28 |
|
|
|
| Martin Cooper |
Posted on 27-09-2014 00:22
|
|
Member Location: Ipswich, Suffolk Posts: 628 Joined: 01.05.12 |
crop of head including orbital setae
Martin Cooper attached the following image:  [143.47Kb] |
|
|
|
| Martin Cooper |
Posted on 27-09-2014 00:23
|
|
Member Location: Ipswich, Suffolk Posts: 628 Joined: 01.05.12 |
back of thorax
Martin Cooper attached the following image:  [142.42Kb] |
|
|
|
| Martin Cooper |
Posted on 27-09-2014 00:27
|
|
Member Location: Ipswich, Suffolk Posts: 628 Joined: 01.05.12 |
... and genitalia. Does this show enough detail, or do I need to get the caustic soda ready? Martin Cooper attached the following image:  [146.64Kb] |
|
|
|
| javanerkelens |
Posted on 27-09-2014 21:39
|
|
Member Location: Netherlands Posts: 2962 Joined: 18.10.07 |
Very good and sharp photos! Paregle audacula it is. Compliments, Johanna |
|
|
|
| Martin Cooper |
Posted on 27-09-2014 22:09
|
|
Member Location: Ipswich, Suffolk Posts: 628 Joined: 01.05.12 |
Thanks Johanna! There are no records for that species in my county of Suffolk on the UK National Biodiversity Network's Gateway, though that is probably due to under-reporting as few people submit records for Diptera. Best wishes, Martin |
|
|
|
| Jump to Forum: |
but don't see the image in the post.