Posted by Andrew Whittington on 24-05-2007 19:54
#7
Markus
I would normally agree that the genitalia are required, but in this instance I think we
can do better than just the genus. The specimen has only three radial veins, making it a member of the subgenus
Kimminsia, of which there are rather few with such distinctive markings. The markings rule out
W.(K.) subnebusosus, so I would even hazard that it is
W.(K.) fassnidgei. Are you in southern Germany?
I love the clarity of the photo!