Posted by Stephen R on 20-03-2012 13:41
#2
Not
C. humilis because the av and ad setae on the hind tibia are too far apart. I can only see one seta on the proepisternum (which, in combination with other visible characters, would suggest female
C. testacea/infantula), but a different view or higher resolution could reveal a second smaller anterior seta, leading to a group of species which can't be separated from this angle.
When was the photo taken?
Edited by Stephen R on 20-03-2012 13:42