Thread subject: Diptera.info :: Helina evecta/annosa
Posted by Maherjos on 18-02-2012 19:50
#1
Photograph taken on February 18, 2012, in the wetlands of the Suárez Pond, Motril, Granada, Spain.
Immediate area of the Mediterranean coast.
Click over the image increases in size
Appreciate your cooperation for identification.
Best regards!
Edited by Maherjos on 21-02-2012 17:44
Posted by Stephane Lebrun on 19-02-2012 12:41
#2
Possibly
Helina evecta. Other pictures are required to be sure.
Posted by Maherjos on 19-02-2012 18:56
#3
Stephane Lebrun wrote:
Possibly Helina evecta. Other pictures are required to be sure.
In this one, I think if I made more pictures. I'll upload when I can process them.
See you soon, thanks and regards.
Posted by Maherjos on 20-02-2012 19:32
#4
I add two more photos of the same specimen of fly, to help identification.
Thank you.
Posted by Maherjos on 20-02-2012 19:32
#5
.
Posted by Stephane Lebrun on 20-02-2012 19:37
#6
The hind leg chaetotaxy is still hidden, but it do looks like
Helina evecta/
annosa.
Posted by Maherjos on 20-02-2012 20:01
#7
Stephane Lebrun wrote:
The hind leg chaetotaxy is still hidden, but it do looks like Helina evecta/annosa.
I'll add another picture has more of the same fly. I think it does little to clarify their identification.
I edit the title to avoid confusion.
Very grateful for your help.
Best regards.
Posted by Maherjos on 20-02-2012 20:13
#8
I add another picture.
Posted by Stephane Lebrun on 20-02-2012 21:20
#9
I still can't see, and it still looks like H. annosa/evecta. :P
Posted by Piluca_Alvarez on 20-02-2012 21:40
#10
Pepe, te ayudo hablando en nuestro idioma :D :D : se necesita ver bien el número y posición de los pelos de las patas traseras ;) Sinó, se queda en
Helina evecta/annosa :D :D
Translation for anybody interested :D: I help you talking in our languaje: it is required to see properly the number and position of the hind legs bristles. Otherwise, it will remain being
Helina evecta/annosa.
Posted by Maherjos on 21-02-2012 11:31
#11
Stephane Lebrun wrote:
I still can't see, and it still looks like H. annosa/evecta. :P
Piluca_Alvarez wrote:
Translation for anybody interested :D: I help you talking in our languaje: it is required to see properly the number and position of the hind legs bristles. Otherwise, it will remain being Helina evecta/annosa.
I thank you both, your clarification. ;)
As I have said many times, I am "Google Traslator dependent." And sometimes the translations are confusing. :|
In this fly, I have no more pictures. Must await a better opportunity to see the hairs on the legs ... while not epilating .. :)
Best regards.
Posted by Piluca_Alvarez on 21-02-2012 14:16
#12
Pepe, I am astonished to see how well you manage with the translator ;) It helps to communicate, even if it is far from perfect.
And don't worry. At least, you know what detail you need to shoot next time :) You can do it, your pictures are great! |t