Thread subject: Diptera.info :: Heleomyzidae Heteromyza? male

Posted by blowave on 20-01-2012 22:36
#1

Hello,

This was inside on 7th January, near Lincoln UK. It was small, I think 5-6mm. It looks to me like Heteromyza but the eyes are different to H. atricornis male. Could this be Heteromyza oculata? There are no photos to be found, I did find a female which looks very much like the one I had in December ..

http://www.dipter...d_id=44233

http://www.biolib.../id106202/

Janet

Posted by blowave on 20-01-2012 22:36
#2

2

Posted by blowave on 20-01-2012 22:37
#3

3

Posted by blowave on 20-01-2012 22:38
#4

4

Posted by blowave on 20-01-2012 22:38
#5

5

Posted by Andrzej on 20-01-2012 23:26
#6

H. atricornis

Posted by blowave on 20-01-2012 23:38
#7

Andrzej wrote:
H. atricornis


Thank you Andrzej :), that is what I had named it but the photos of the male in the gallery show the eyes to be closer together, nor do they look as deep. Why is this?

http://www.dipter...to_id=4930

http://www.dipter...to_id=4931

Posted by Tony Irwin on 21-01-2012 00:45
#8

Hi Janet
Your fly is a female. In most groups of flies, the males have bigger eyes, and are thus closer together. It's often one of the easiest ways to sex a fly (but there are exceptions!)

Edited by Tony Irwin on 21-01-2012 00:46

Posted by blowave on 21-01-2012 01:47
#9

Tony Irwin wrote:
Hi Janet
Your fly is a female. In most groups of flies, the males have bigger eyes, and are thus closer together. It's often one of the easiest ways to sex a fly (but there are exceptions!)


Hi Tony... uuhh, no I don't think this is a female, if it is then it has to be another species. ;)

Look at the eyes on the female I posted before ...

http://www.dipter...d_id=44233

Posted by blowave on 21-01-2012 02:07
#10

Another angle of this fly..

Posted by blowave on 21-01-2012 02:09
#11

There's no 'head' showing at all under the eyes ..

Posted by blowave on 21-01-2012 02:11
#12

Female's eyes .. loads of space between them on the face too!

Posted by blowave on 21-01-2012 02:17
#13

I borrowed Roger's photo from the gallery to show the male's eyes of his H. atricornis ..

Posted by blowave on 21-01-2012 03:03
#14

H. rotundicornis fits!

Posted by Tony Irwin on 21-01-2012 11:13
#15

Agreed - it is male. I'll leave it to Andrzej to resolve!

Posted by Andrzej on 21-01-2012 13:32
#16

Hmm, I am in trouble ;-). I will check my collection to compare these species ! Pics are pics only ... :|

Edited by Andrzej on 21-01-2012 13:34

Posted by Andrzej on 21-01-2012 13:36
#17

I enclosed a pic from Czerny (1927) ! It is the head of the true male of H. rotundicornis

Posted by blowave on 21-01-2012 14:06
#18

Andrzej wrote:
I enclosed a pic from Czerny (1927) ! It is the head of the true male of H. rotundicornis


Then it has to be H. rotundicornis Andrzej! I think the drawing has over exaggerated the closeness of the eyes, there are 'grooves' on the face which may have been included in the eyes but really should not have been! I have photos of the same fly from January and early March last year, I posted it but I don't think I got a reply.

The only other Heteromyza is H. oculata which has "eyes tapered near ocelli markedly".

Is there a possibility the female I had could also be H. rotundicornis?

Two shots of the head from last year .. this from 3rd March

Edited by blowave on 21-01-2012 14:11

Posted by blowave on 21-01-2012 14:08
#19

Same fly from 4th March 2011

Edited by blowave on 21-01-2012 14:09

Posted by blowave on 23-01-2012 20:46
#20

Andrzej wrote:
Hmm, I am in trouble ;-). I will check my collection to compare these species ! Pics are pics only ... :|


Hi Andrzej, have you managed to compare your collection yet?

Assuming it is Heteromyza then it should be H. rotundicornis. Unless it is a different genus of course! ;)

It would be a nice addition to the gallery!

(p.s. I got another one on the window recently! :D)