Thread subject: Diptera.info :: Australian Muscidae?

Posted by Graeme Cocks on 02-03-2011 00:22
#1

This looks like a Tachinidae to me but the arista are basally plumose?
Malaise trap, Townsville, Queensland.

Edited by Graeme Cocks on 02-03-2011 01:11

Posted by jorgemotalmeida on 02-03-2011 00:23
#2

not bent M-vein, plumose arista, no strong bristles on abdomen.. I doubt it is Tachinidae..

Edited by jorgemotalmeida on 02-03-2011 00:24

Posted by ChrisR on 02-03-2011 00:24
#3

It's possible but you really need to check for a subscutellum to be sure - it could still be a sarcophagid :)

Posted by ChrisR on 02-03-2011 00:26
#4

jorgemotalmeida wrote:
not bent M-vein, plumose arista, no strong bristles on abdomen.. I doubt it is Tachinidae..

I wasn't sure whether there was a hidden bend - the angle of the wing could be confusing :)

Posted by jorgemotalmeida on 02-03-2011 00:34
#5

well, at least there is not a strong bent in m vein. But also as you know there are not much tachinidae with plumose arista!

Posted by Graeme Cocks on 02-03-2011 00:42
#6

another view

Posted by ChrisR on 02-03-2011 00:44
#7

Yeah, unlikely to be a tachinid, unless you have one with a straight median vein, but that is still possible (eg. Ocytata) so it's best to just check for a subscutellum :)

Posted by jorgemotalmeida on 02-03-2011 00:44
#8

well.. m vein not bends as I told. ;)

And I agree: it is needed to see the subscutellum, if there is, just to be sure!

Edited by jorgemotalmeida on 02-03-2011 00:46

Posted by Graeme Cocks on 02-03-2011 00:45
#9

I had the fly on hand so I took the pin out and got another view. Is it of any use?
Can't see a subscutellum - Sarcophagidae?
Terga overlapping sterites - Tachinidae?

Posted by ChrisR on 02-03-2011 00:48
#10

No subscutellum and straight median vein would suggest Muscidae, as Jorge says. :) I was never very convinced by the sternite/tergite feature ... if it lacks meral/hypopleural bristles then it would definitely be a muscid or anthomyid :)

Posted by Gerard Pennards on 02-03-2011 00:55
#11

To put it simple, looks like a Muscidae to me, genus Lispe......
Wait for Nikita to see it, maybe he'll be able to confirm the idea... :D
Greetings

PS Graeme, I'm happy to see you have survived the 10 meter waves at Townsville,

Posted by Graeme Cocks on 02-03-2011 00:59
#12

If I am right then the hypopleuron is slightly anterior and below the spiracle, located beneath the calypters? If so then there are no bristles.

Posted by Graeme Cocks on 02-03-2011 01:06
#13

Hi Gerrard,
We only had a couple of windows broken, which was a relief. The backyard was 8 feet deep in broken branches. A lack of insects at the moment, but they will recover quickly. BTW I have a blue box full if you want it? Started on the next box.
Graeme

Posted by ChrisR on 02-03-2011 01:13
#14

No hypopleurals (you're correct on the position) puts this fly way out of my comfort zone ... so over to Nikita :D

Posted by jorgemotalmeida on 02-03-2011 01:14
#15

I agree with Gerard. And large palpi is one of the features that we can see in Lispe genera, and in the last photo it is clear. If it was here in europe, it would be a Lispe, really.

Edited by jorgemotalmeida on 02-03-2011 01:18

Posted by Graeme Cocks on 02-03-2011 01:22
#16

That's great, thanks everybody.
Cheers, Graeme

Posted by Nikita Vikhrev on 02-03-2011 09:56
#17

Of course Lispe as Gerard said.
Probably female Lispe assimilis