Thread subject: Diptera.info :: Tachinidae > Cylindromyia intermedia?

Posted by nick upton on 26-11-2010 23:36
#1

Can anyone say which Cylindromyia species this is. C. pusilla? C.intermedia?

31.8.10 c12mm Lesbos, Greece

Edited by nick upton on 26-09-2011 23:03

Posted by nick upton on 26-11-2010 23:37
#2

Profile view of a different individual with less white on the abdomen, but the same species?

Posted by ChrisR on 26-11-2010 23:53
#3

Hmm, I'm not sure that I can see enough really ... I don't think it is C.pusilla because the inner edge of the calyptrae don't look dark enough.

Posted by nick upton on 27-11-2010 00:00
#4

Do you need any specific angle of view/ close ups to get more clues? I got several shots of these. If not C. pusilla, could it be C. intermedia?

Posted by ChrisR on 27-11-2010 00:42
#5

Well, we need to first check if the back tibiae have postero-ventral bristles ... then whether they have apical scutellar bristles ... then whether it has 1 or 2 sternopleural (katepisternal) bristles :)

Assuming that the pv bristles are there and the apical scutellars aren't (and remember it's not enough to say you can't see any - we need to know they are absent) then I'd favour C.intermedia ... except Theo will probably remind us that there are a few other species down there that aren't in the Central european keys :D

Edited by ChrisR on 27-11-2010 00:43

Posted by Zeegers on 27-11-2010 10:37
#6

I agree it looks like a female pusilla in habitus and colouration, however,the third antennal segment seems to be too long ??


Theo

Posted by nick upton on 27-11-2010 13:55
#7

Many thanks Chris and Theo.

As the ID seems uncertain still, here a number of close up views of the body parts mentioned.... Hope they help, though I'm running out of pixels on this!

I think I can see some hairs on the scutellum and if I'm looking in the right place (big IF), maybe there are 2 sternopleural bristles, and over to you two to check the 3rd antennal segment length.

Posted by nick upton on 27-11-2010 13:56
#8

Back legs

Posted by nick upton on 27-11-2010 13:58
#9

Thorax profile

Posted by nick upton on 27-11-2010 13:59
#10

Thorax dorsal view

Posted by ChrisR on 27-11-2010 18:55
#11

Hmm, can I see crossed apical scutellars in the last photo? Perhaps C.intermedia?

Posted by nick upton on 28-11-2010 20:35
#12

I'm not quite sure what to look for....as I'm no expert in tachinid bristle analysis but if I'm looking in the right place, there aren't many hairs on the scutellum per se that I can see, mainly just 2 long hairs that originate near the front of the scutellum and they seem parallel and don't cross with any others as far as i can see. Looking from the side, some hairs do seem to cross, but most of those originate on the thorax. Hope this helps, and doesn't confuse the ID further!

Edited by nick upton on 28-11-2010 20:36

Posted by Zeegers on 28-11-2010 20:42
#13

The pictures are simply insufficient to reach a conclusion.

The apical scutallar must be there, since it is not interrupta given the dust pattern on the thorax...

see, how misleading it can be ?


Theo

Posted by nick upton on 29-11-2010 21:37
#14

OK thanks both for trying. Tricky group... Cylindromyia sp. will have to do.

Posted by nick upton on 26-09-2011 23:03
#15

I've been back to Lesbos since I posted the Cylindromyia images and have new photos of the same species (I think). In these ones the presence of crossed apical scutellar hairs is more obvious in the high res original (something I can just make out on the other ones also on re-Checking them. So I think that makes the ID for both sets of pics C. intermedia. No doubt Chris and/or Theo will correct me if I'm wrong!

2.6.11 c12mm Lesbos

Posted by ChrisR on 26-09-2011 23:05
#16

The last is C.bicolor ;)

Edited by ChrisR on 26-09-2011 23:08

Posted by nick upton on 27-09-2011 11:26
#17

OK, thanks Chris. I knew i could trust you to correct me. I didn't realise C. bicolor could have such obvious white banding on the abdomen.... but yes, C. intermedia has a darker tip to the abdomen, and darker wings (if those characters are stable....). I still think my earlier pics from Lesbos last autumn are C. intermedia if the crossed hairs at the rear tip of the scutellum is important as I really can see those in the originals now have re-checked. The new photo was from this spring (as were some C. bicolor I photographed on Corsica last year). Maybe the 2 species are active in different seasons..? or my encounters were just by chance..

Posted by ChrisR on 27-09-2011 17:55
#18

Yeah, C.bicolor is the only species with a red tip to the abdomen, so it is very easy to identify :) The rest are another thing entirely ;)

Posted by nick upton on 27-09-2011 18:32
#19

Oh dear... There's not much hope for me if I can't even ID the easy ones every time. Better stick to the easier families...:)

Posted by ChrisR on 27-09-2011 18:52
#20

Well, don't worry - I know there are some indicators of species by the overall appearance but (with the exception of bicolor) I would always need to check the keying features, which can be very obscure - a bristle on the hind tibia, apical scutellars and other smaller features ;)

Edited by ChrisR on 27-09-2011 18:53

Posted by nick upton on 28-09-2011 13:27
#21

Thanks Chris. that makes me feel better. OK, Ill keep taking tachinid photos as long as you're happy to keep counting the bristles to help ID them! That way, some unusual ones might turn up!