Thread subject: Diptera.info :: Tachinidae small
Posted by thijsdegraaf on 20-10-2009 22:04
#1
Photographed in the Netherlands 20-10-09. Bergen (N.H.)
Tachinidae. Small, about 5, 6mm. Again I don't know the species :|. They are so difficult.
Best regards,
Thijs
Edited by thijsdegraaf on 20-10-2009 22:12
Posted by thijsdegraaf on 20-10-2009 22:04
#2
second photo
Posted by thijsdegraaf on 20-10-2009 22:06
#3
third photo
Posted by thijsdegraaf on 20-10-2009 22:07
#4
last photo
Posted by Jaakko on 21-10-2009 14:37
#5
Hmm.. Exoristini. Could be even one of the smaller
Exorista, such as
tubulosa or then something like
Bessa selecta? Facial ridges look bare, though.
Posted by thijsdegraaf on 22-10-2009 15:59
#6
Thanks Jaakko,
I see no suggestions of other Tachinidae experts. So I think they agree with you. A difficult fly again.
Best regards, Thijs
Posted by ChrisR on 22-10-2009 18:45
#7
Something of a mystery to me - I don't know anything quite that small but Jaakko's suggestion of
Bessa sounds probable - not sure if it is possible to prove it though :)
Edited by ChrisR on 22-10-2009 20:51
Posted by Zeegers on 22-10-2009 19:58
#8
I missed this, but indepedent of Jaakko I reached the same conclusion: Bessa selecta.
And then I saw his message
Theo
Posted by ChrisR on 22-10-2009 20:52
#9
Is the identification based on the fact that there really isn't much else in the Exoristini that is so small? The antennae look quite distinctive. :)
Posted by thijsdegraaf on 22-10-2009 20:52
#10
Thanks Theo, Chris and Jaakko. Three experts with the same name :)
Best regards,
Thijs
Posted by thijsdegraaf on 22-10-2009 21:25
#11
I hadn't seen your question Chris. Both: 21:52 :|
Thijs
Posted by ChrisR on 22-10-2009 21:43
#12
That's OK ... I hardly ever see
Bessa but they are tiny and they look like this so Jaakko's suggestion seemed a good one. But I was just interested to see if Theo or Jaakko used some other features in their IDs :) We are all learning :D
Edited by ChrisR on 22-10-2009 21:43
Posted by Jaakko on 23-10-2009 07:41
#13
Hi Chris!
Just a combination of features: sharp kink in the m-vein, white hairs behind the head, low "short-legged" sitting position and small size. Here in North,
B. selecta is the only common one fitting to this criteria, and you have even less species in the UK, so I was encouraged to suggest that.
Posted by ChrisR on 23-10-2009 08:25
#14
Thanks Jaakko - I have some Russian
B.parallela and
selecta so I'll have another look at them :)
Posted by thijsdegraaf on 23-10-2009 10:04
#15
you have even less species in the UK
Thanks for the explanation Jaakko. I know much more now about my fly. For I could not find much on internet. But I live in the Netherlands ;)
Thijs
Posted by Jaakko on 23-10-2009 13:29
#16
Sorry Thijs! Somehow got mixed up with the various authors on this thread... :P