Thread subject: Diptera.info :: Miltogrammine to ID

Posted by Rui Andrade on 07-08-2009 22:24
#1

What can be said about it?

location: Esposende, Portugal
date: 03/08/2009

img193.imageshack.us/img193/8771/mi1i.jpg

Posted by Zeegers on 08-08-2009 09:59
#2

The wing venation is very costal, if you look closely.
So it should be something like Taxigramma or Paragusia.


Theo

Posted by Rui Andrade on 09-08-2009 21:43
#3

Thank you Theo. What would be necessary to make it possible to pick one over the other?

Posted by Zeegers on 10-08-2009 17:59
#4

that I pick up a book

I will


Theo

Posted by Zeegers on 10-08-2009 17:59
#5

that I pick up a book

I will


Theo

Posted by Zeegers on 10-08-2009 17:59
#6

that I pick up a book

I will


Theo

Posted by Roger Thomason on 10-08-2009 18:09
#7

Zeegers wrote:
that I pick up a book

I will


Theo

Thats three times that's come up Theo.....got a st.stut.. stutter.
My message on Shoutbox did the same...and my name was up twice as being online Christ one of me is bad enough....all those who agree...raise your RIGHT HAND.

Posted by Zeegers on 10-08-2009 18:12
#8

Roger that, my browser crashed from some reasons.
Back again


Theo

Posted by Zeegers on 10-08-2009 18:16
#9

there seem to be no post ACR-bristles, which would rather suggest the genus Hilarella.
Two - three very similar species.
I hope Liekele can confirm/deny Hilarella and give more comments


Theo (posted once)

Posted by Rui Andrade on 14-08-2009 16:36
#10

Thanks for your help Theo, lets wait to see what Liekele says about it:).

Posted by Liekele Sijstermans on 13-09-2009 21:06
#11

Oeps, I forgot to reply on this thread.

I think it is not Hilarella nor Paragusia (now often included in Taxigramma), but Taxigramma sensu stricto.
Head and sholders have silverish powder, which is not the case in Hilarella.
Head is different from Paragusia.

Furthermore I have the impression it is a small specimen (comparing to the grains of sand) which fits with Taxigramma.

Liekele

Posted by Rui Andrade on 16-09-2009 19:57
#12

Yes, the specimen was small. Thank you very much!