Gallery Links
Users Online
· Guests Online: 13

· Members Online: 0

· Total Members: 4,953
· Newest Member: Adam Poole
Forum Threads
Theme Switcher
Switch to:
Last Seen Users
· Nosferatumyia00:38:38
· Juergen Peters02:15:58
· Tetrao03:51:57
· weia05:52:49
· Mario Renden06:30:24
· evdb06:43:01
· Joerg Schneider06:59:59
· smol07:22:52
· ESant08:38:20
· Carnifex08:55:14
Latest Photo Additions
View Thread
Diptera.info :: Identification queries :: Diptera (adults)
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 Print Thread
Fannia sp with genitalia
johnes81
#1 Print Post
Posted on 15-10-2017 20:25
User Avatar

Member

Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 1978
Joined: 15.10.16

Berlin - October - 6mm male

I cannot find drawings of genitalia of all European species. I believe that this is Fannia but I am not 100% certain.

Thank You for your Time and Effort
johnes81 attached the following image:


[94.98Kb]
John and Nini. Naturalists not experts.
 
johnes81
#2 Print Post
Posted on 15-10-2017 20:25
User Avatar

Member

Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 1978
Joined: 15.10.16

specimen lateral
johnes81 attached the following image:


[89.21Kb]
John and Nini. Naturalists not experts.
 
johnes81
#3 Print Post
Posted on 15-10-2017 20:25
User Avatar

Member

Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 1978
Joined: 15.10.16

specimen lateral
johnes81 attached the following image:


[114.39Kb]
John and Nini. Naturalists not experts.
 
johnes81
#4 Print Post
Posted on 15-10-2017 20:26
User Avatar

Member

Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 1978
Joined: 15.10.16

wing looks like Fannia
johnes81 attached the following image:


[61.63Kb]
John and Nini. Naturalists not experts.
 
johnes81
#5 Print Post
Posted on 15-10-2017 20:26
User Avatar

Member

Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 1978
Joined: 15.10.16

face
johnes81 attached the following image:


[75.41Kb]
John and Nini. Naturalists not experts.
 
johnes81
#6 Print Post
Posted on 15-10-2017 20:27
User Avatar

Member

Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 1978
Joined: 15.10.16

arista
johnes81 attached the following image:


[105.5Kb]
John and Nini. Naturalists not experts.
 
johnes81
#7 Print Post
Posted on 15-10-2017 20:27
User Avatar

Member

Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 1978
Joined: 15.10.16

thorax
johnes81 attached the following image:


[123.87Kb]
John and Nini. Naturalists not experts.
 
johnes81
#8 Print Post
Posted on 15-10-2017 20:27
User Avatar

Member

Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 1978
Joined: 15.10.16

lateral
johnes81 attached the following image:


[105.8Kb]
John and Nini. Naturalists not experts.
 
johnes81
#9 Print Post
Posted on 15-10-2017 20:28
User Avatar

Member

Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 1978
Joined: 15.10.16

abdomen without yellow/orange so not cannicularis
johnes81 attached the following image:


[80.54Kb]
John and Nini. Naturalists not experts.
 
johnes81
#10 Print Post
Posted on 15-10-2017 20:28
User Avatar

Member

Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 1978
Joined: 15.10.16

hind leg
johnes81 attached the following image:


[44.55Kb]
John and Nini. Naturalists not experts.
 
johnes81
#11 Print Post
Posted on 15-10-2017 20:29
User Avatar

Member

Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 1978
Joined: 15.10.16

epandrium dorsal
johnes81 attached the following image:


[94.36Kb]
John and Nini. Naturalists not experts.
 
johnes81
#12 Print Post
Posted on 15-10-2017 20:29
User Avatar

Member

Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 1978
Joined: 15.10.16

epandrium lateral
johnes81 attached the following image:


[70.88Kb]
John and Nini. Naturalists not experts.
 
johnes81
#13 Print Post
Posted on 17-10-2017 10:45
User Avatar

Member

Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 1978
Joined: 15.10.16

consulting the following material:
Lindner Der Fliegen der Palaearktischen Region Band 2
63b. Muscidae, Tafel 1 - figure 8

I think that the genitalia resembles the drawing of Fannia canicularis variation (pubescens from Stein).

what is the status of this variation? this was debated over 50 years ago. Certainly something has changed by now, yes? I understand that a few dipterists have discussed this species and conclude that it is a variation of Fannia canicularis. Hennig mentions that this variation has no yellow on the tergites. Could this be the variation?





John and Nini. Naturalists not experts.
 
Paul Beuk
#14 Print Post
Posted on 17-10-2017 13:23
User Avatar

Super Administrator

Location: Netherlands
Posts: 19225
Joined: 11.05.04

Could be Fannia aquilineata, both that description and the specimen at hand.
Paul

- - - -

Paul Beuk on https://diptera.info
 
diptera.info
johnes81
#15 Print Post
Posted on 17-10-2017 19:49
User Avatar

Member

Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 1978
Joined: 15.10.16

Thank You for replying, Paul. I will look at this tomorrow. I am clearing the genitalia and the sternites for better viewing. I'll rexamine this specimen with Fannia aquilineata in focus. I need to make better photos of the genitalia, especially in lateral view...

Thank You.
John and Nini. Naturalists not experts.
 
johnes81
#16 Print Post
Posted on 18-10-2017 20:20
User Avatar

Member

Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 1978
Joined: 15.10.16

Dear Paul, at first I couldn't figure out how you arrive at F. aequilineata because I have been using the work of Hennig to identify this fly. The drawings of Hennig do not match anything. Today, my Wife and I have spent hours researching Fannidae. We found the document from Fonseca. The genitalia only matches Fannia aequilineata of fonseca not Hennig. The keys/description are inconclusive because the anterior prealar doesn't seem to be strong in my opinion. The hind tibia seems to match but the midtibia is questionable. The genitalia look most like Fannia aequilineata but not exactly. Yet no other genitalia looks like this, so it must be Fannia aequilineata.

Fannidae are very difficult to key. I've spent hours looking at this one. I am tired.

Thank You for helping Paul. I really needed a hand with this one.
Edited by johnes81 on 18-10-2017 20:20
John and Nini. Naturalists not experts.
 
Jump to Forum:
Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
Fannia mollissima? Diptera (adults) 10 15-04-2024 22:37
ID please --> Fannia canicularis Diptera (adults) 5 12-04-2024 20:47
Muscidae? (Fannia manicata) Diptera (adults) 7 12-04-2024 19:46
Anthomyiidae ? --> No, Fannia sp. Diptera (adults) 4 03-04-2024 16:18
Muscoidea #1 from 29.02.24 --> Fannia sp. Diptera (adults) 4 13-03-2024 19:14
Date and time
16 April 2024 05:07
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Temporary email?
Due to fact this site has functionality making use of your email address, any registration using a temporary email address will be rejected.

Paul
Donate
Please, help to make
Diptera.info
possible and enable
further improvements!
Latest Articles
Syrph the Net
Those who want to have access to the Syrph the Net database need to sign the
License Agreement -
Click to Download


Public files of Syrph the Net can be downloaded HERE

Last updated: 25.08.2011
Shoutbox
You must login to post a message.

07.03.24 00:01
Some flies preserved in ethanol and then pinned often get the eyes sunken, how can this be avoided? Best answer: I usually keep alcohol-collected material in alcohol

17.08.23 15:23
Aneomochtherus

17.08.23 13:54
Tony, I HAD a blank in the file name. Sorry!

17.08.23 13:44
Tony, thanks! I tried it (see "Cylindromyia" Wink but don't see the image in the post.

17.08.23 11:37
pjt - just send the post and attached image. Do not preview thread, as this will lose the link to the image,

16.08.23 08:37
Tried to attach an image to a forum post. jpg, 32kB, 72dpi, no blanks, ... File name is correctly displayed, but when I click "Preview Thread" it just vanishes. Help!

23.02.23 21:29
Has anyone used the Leica DM500, any comments.

27.12.22 21:10
Thanks, Jan Willem! Much appreciated. Grin

19.12.22 11:33
Thanks Paul for your work on keeping this forum available! Just made a donation via PayPal.

09.10.22 17:07
Yes, dipterologists from far abroad, please buy your copy at veldshop. Stamps will be expensive, but he, the book is unreasonably cheap Smile

Render time: 2.06 seconds | 190,993,658 unique visits