Posted by Sundew on 17-07-2014 20:31
#7
I see - sometimes
Tolmerus and
Machimus are treated as congeneric. I am adapted to botanical terminology: a "complex" comprises closely related (micro)species of the
same genus, so when you said "
Machimus complex" to me it was clear that the fly belonged to genus
Machimus in any case, while
Tolmerus is a different genus. However, systematics of these genera has obviously not been settled to date, as the paper by Dikow (2009) underlines (
http://www.tdvia...._2009b.pdf). The Asilidae Atlas by Geller-Grimm
(http://www.robbe...himus.html) speaks of the "
Machimus-group" - ok, "group" or "complex" might be used synonymously ;).
Anyhow, now I know that it is no
Neoitamus: the ovipositor is too short, and the long and sharply bent postocular bristles are lacking |t.
Edited by Sundew on 17-07-2014 20:55