---

Hi Tony, thanks - The second picture looks really perfect, and I see that frontal setae were broken away in reality, not by the software. (I wondered why some setae are "cut" by underlying wrinkles and other sharp details.) The better quality of snapshots the more problems with sharp areas excluding each other. In my case, the hardware is too poor to expose results here in galleries, but at least in the cases like this one, to avoid losses of crossed details, I am making a sum of frontal details alone, middle layer and the background separately, and then make a sum again. I am using CZM, but it works pretty well, too.