Posted by smol on 03-02-2024 21:33
#6
John Carr wrote:
I think you took a wrong turn at Søli couplet 95. Your fly matches "Anepisternum with strong bristles at least near upper margin".
I think you took a wrong turn at Søli couplet 95. Your fly matches "Anepisternum with strong bristles at least near upper margin".
Thank you very much again! You are right, I looked at the katepisternum...
Walther Gritsch wrote:
Anepimeron isn't visible, but the general impression leads me to Mycetophila sp.
Anepimeron isn't visible, but the general impression leads me to Mycetophila sp.
Thank you very much Walther Gritsch. With the correction of John Carr, I came to the same conclusion. I added a picture of where I believe in the Anepimeron with setae.
I could not find much further information, but read that from this point on most are categorized in species-groups, but did not find resources that described what is needed for further ID. At least not Mycetophila ruficollis-group I believe, but not sure further. If more details are needed, I can look through the raw pictures again. I have read Peter Chandler talked about making an extensive key of this genus, but could not find more about this.