Diptera.info :: Identification queries :: Diptera (adults)
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
Dark biggish Tachinidae from N Spain to ID please -> Gymnophryxe cf. inconspicua
|
|
Marian |
Posted on 15-09-2014 17:03
|
Member Location: Oviedo, N Spain Posts: 295 Joined: 24.06.11 |
Hi, fly lovers! I have this Tachinidae found in a kind of garden close to coastal cliffs in Cabo PeƱas (Asturias, N Spain) on July the 28th. No ideas about it. Can anyone help me? Thanks in advance for any hint! Regards Marian attached the following image: [145.25Kb] Edited by Marian on 25-09-2014 07:54 |
|
|
Marian |
Posted on 15-09-2014 17:04
|
Member Location: Oviedo, N Spain Posts: 295 Joined: 24.06.11 |
Another view of the same specimen:
Marian attached the following image: [158.87Kb] |
|
|
Zeegers |
Posted on 15-09-2014 18:16
|
Member Location: Soest, NL Posts: 18529 Joined: 21.07.04 |
The only thing that makes sense is Gymnophryxe. I know it is active in early spring. Does it have a second generation ? I don't have time to look it up right now, come back to you Theo |
|
|
Marian |
Posted on 15-09-2014 20:48
|
Member Location: Oviedo, N Spain Posts: 295 Joined: 24.06.11 |
No idea about the number of generations. :-( But I can try to find out... Anyway, loads of thanks for your reply!! And looking forward to hearing from you. Regards |
|
|
Zeegers |
Posted on 15-09-2014 21:20
|
Member Location: Soest, NL Posts: 18529 Joined: 21.07.04 |
So, I had a very quick look in Mesnil: It could be the other Gymnophryxe (from my perspective): G. inconspicua. So far only recorded from the Pyrenees. That is active in summer ! This still needs to be verified, but that would be a terrific find !. Theo |
|
|
Marian |
Posted on 16-09-2014 17:55
|
Member Location: Oviedo, N Spain Posts: 295 Joined: 24.06.11 |
Thank you very much, Theo!! I can't find images of Gymnophryxe inconspicua, and I don't have any description. Is there anything to be seen to verify its a Gymnophryxe? This couple of pictures attached are the best I have but I took several other shots and I might have other details to show. If you are right and it's Gymnophryxe inconspicua I'll do the effort to try to verify the identity of this character. Regards |
|
|
Zeegers |
Posted on 16-09-2014 21:06
|
Member Location: Soest, NL Posts: 18529 Joined: 21.07.04 |
I have no doubt it is Gymnophryxe. A picture from behind would help. Based on the head shape, it is indeed G. inconspicua. But I would like to see the abdominal pattern from behind to be more sure. Theo |
|
|
Zeegers |
Posted on 16-09-2014 21:07
|
Member Location: Soest, NL Posts: 18529 Joined: 21.07.04 |
Oh, by the way, the species is very little collected, therefore, only description available is in Mesnil in Lindner: 509 ( as Archiclops !) Theo |
|
|
Marian |
Posted on 17-09-2014 10:29
|
Member Location: Oviedo, N Spain Posts: 295 Joined: 24.06.11 |
I'm very sorry, Theo, I misunderstood you when you said "The only thing that makes sense is Gymnophryxe". I thought you got there just by ruling out other possibilities. Anyway, once it's clear it is a Gymnophryxe, here you have a rear view of the abdomen. I hope it helps. And loads of thanks for your help and interest!! Marian attached the following image: [143.97Kb] |
|
|
Zeegers |
Posted on 19-09-2014 08:41
|
Member Location: Soest, NL Posts: 18529 Joined: 21.07.04 |
Based on the shape of the head, this is probably Gymnophryxe inconspicua. That is a tremendous nice find ! So far, only known from a few localities in the Pyrenees. The pattern on the abdomen, however, differs from the description. It could be that the species is variable. The same holds for G. carthaginiensis. Theo |
|
|
Zeegers |
Posted on 19-09-2014 09:50
|
Member Location: Soest, NL Posts: 18529 Joined: 21.07.04 |
Update: -1) I checked my G. cathaginiensis. In all cases, tergite 3 lacks any trace of black apical border. Therefore, this specimen above must be G. inconspicua indeed. -2) G. inconspicua has been treated with picture by Cerretti in his Italian monograph -3) According to Herting (1984), G. inconspicua occurs from Spain via Turkey to Mongolia. So widespread, but very rare everywhere. |
|
|
sd |
Posted on 19-09-2014 10:30
|
Member Location: Suffolk, UK Posts: 892 Joined: 11.10.07 |
Hi Theo, What do you think about this other specimen which Chris thought might be Gymnophryxe rather than Pachystylum? http://www.dipter...d_id=54648 regards, Steve |
|
|
Zeegers |
Posted on 19-09-2014 11:46
|
Member Location: Soest, NL Posts: 18529 Joined: 21.07.04 |
Yes, good point. I looked at it this morning. There are clearly discal bristles present. That shouldn't be in Gymnophryxe cathaginiensis. So either it is something else or this species is variable as well. In my cathaginiensis (n = 5), discal are really absent. Theo |
|
|
Marian |
Posted on 24-09-2014 19:04
|
Member Location: Oviedo, N Spain Posts: 295 Joined: 24.06.11 |
Thank you very much for the effort to ID this and all the information!! But at this point I'm somehow confused, as I have no idea about Gymnophryxe. Which is the best way to edit this thread? "Gymnophryxe cf. inconspicua"? "cf. Gymnophryxe inconspicua"? Or the ID as Gymnophryxe inconspicua is sure enough (in spite of the possible variability)? |
|
|
Zeegers |
Posted on 24-09-2014 19:20
|
Member Location: Soest, NL Posts: 18529 Joined: 21.07.04 |
Identifications on pictures are never 100 % sure. I would go for Gymnophryxe cf. inconspicua. Theo |
|
|
Marian |
Posted on 25-09-2014 07:53
|
Member Location: Oviedo, N Spain Posts: 295 Joined: 24.06.11 |
OK, Theo, thanks a lot. I'm at last editing the title of this thread. Thank you again for all your effort. Regards |
|
Jump to Forum: |