Diptera.info :: Identification queries :: Diptera (adults)
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 Rhagio conspicuus (Rhagionidae)
|
|
| Karol Ox |
Posted on 21-08-2014 18:01
|
 Member Location: Slovakia Posts: 1317 Joined: 25.01.11 |
Hello. Rhagio vitripennis (male) is correct? 19.5.2014, Slovakia, Kosice. Thank you. Regards. Karol Ox attached the following image:  [185.59Kb] Edited by Karol Ox on 26-08-2014 18:38 |
 |
|
| Zeegers |
Posted on 22-08-2014 07:14
|
|
Member Location: Soest, NL Posts: 18518 Joined: 21.07.04 |
I don't think so, I don't see any colouration in the wing. The legs are very long: might be conspicuus. Theo |
|
|
|
| Karol Ox |
Posted on 23-08-2014 08:46
|
|
Member Location: Slovakia Posts: 1317 Joined: 25.01.11 |
Zeegers wrote: I don't think so, I don't see any colouration in the wing. The legs are very long: might be conspicuus. Theo Thank you Theo. |
|
|
|
| libor |
Posted on 23-08-2014 11:31
|
|
Member Location: western Bohemia Posts: 1267 Joined: 30.05.09 |
I disagree, Theo. The whole wings are evidently darkened. For me it is R. vitripennis. Libor |
|
|
|
| Zeegers |
Posted on 23-08-2014 15:02
|
|
Member Location: Soest, NL Posts: 18518 Joined: 21.07.04 |
In any case, I am not sure on either. theo |
|
|
|
| Zeegers |
Posted on 23-08-2014 15:22
|
|
Member Location: Soest, NL Posts: 18518 Joined: 21.07.04 |
Compare with http://www.diptera.info/forum/viewthread.php?forum_id=5&thread_id=38683 the apex of hind femour does not exceed the apex of tergite 4, whereas above the exceed the apex of tergite 5. the shading in the wing you mentioned might be due to the backgroud: Indo not see shading at the apex of discal cell. any other pic would be a big help ! The |
|
|
|
| Karol Ox |
Posted on 24-08-2014 18:31
|
|
Member Location: Slovakia Posts: 1317 Joined: 25.01.11 |
Libor, Theo, thank you for your response. I do not have another picture. |
|
|
|
| libor |
Posted on 25-08-2014 07:11
|
|
Member Location: western Bohemia Posts: 1267 Joined: 30.05.09 |
Karol, sory for my misleading. Theo, sorry too, you are right. I am in my office now with the Rhagionidae collection. On the picture is really Rhagio conspicuus. Rhagio vitripennis has all femora yellow, while R. conspicuus has apical part of femora III darkened. Karol, try to add body length in the future. R. conspicuus is a real beast almost twice longer than R. vitripennis, so body length is sometimes very very helpful. Please, apologize my ID mistake Libor |
|
|
|
| Karol Ox |
Posted on 26-08-2014 18:41
|
|
Member Location: Slovakia Posts: 1317 Joined: 25.01.11 |
libor wrote: Karol, sory for my misleading. Theo, sorry too, you are right. I am in my office now with the Rhagionidae collection. On the picture is really Rhagio conspicuus... Libor, it's ok. Thank you. |
|
|
|
| Jump to Forum: |
but don't see the image in the post.
