Diptera.info :: Identification queries :: Diptera (adults)
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 Tachinidae > Siphona cf. hokkaidensis (male) OK
|
|
| Maherjos |
Posted on 17-05-2014 20:49
|
 Member Location: Motril (Granada) España Posts: 2354 Joined: 02.09.09 |
Photograph taken on May 17, 2014, in agricultural estate with avocados and custard apples and other fruit. Motril, Granada, Spain. Immediate area of the Mediterranean coast. Thanks for help! Maherjos attached the following image:  [110.67Kb] Edited by Maherjos on 18-05-2014 19:08 |
|
|
|
| Maherjos |
Posted on 17-05-2014 20:49
|
|
Member Location: Motril (Granada) España Posts: 2354 Joined: 02.09.09 |
.
Maherjos attached the following image:  [105Kb] |
|
|
|
| Maherjos |
Posted on 17-05-2014 20:50
|
|
Member Location: Motril (Granada) España Posts: 2354 Joined: 02.09.09 |
.
Maherjos attached the following image:  [124.9Kb] |
|
|
|
| Manuel Lopez |
Posted on 17-05-2014 20:59
|
 Member Location: Granada Posts: 2551 Joined: 03.09.11 |
Genus Siphona, sp. my bet 
Manuel |
|
|
|
| Maherjos |
Posted on 18-05-2014 00:18
|
|
Member Location: Motril (Granada) España Posts: 2354 Joined: 02.09.09 |
Manuel Lopez wrote: Genus Siphona, sp. my bet Thank you very much, Manuel. regards. |
|
|
|
| Zeegers |
Posted on 18-05-2014 08:16
|
|
Member Location: Soest, NL Posts: 18948 Joined: 21.07.04 |
very interesting: black tegula, broad third antennal segment and a pair of median marignal bristles on syntergite 1&2: would imply S. hokkaidensis ?? you are not supposed to have this species, I think. I guess it has not been collected ? theo |
|
|
|
| Maherjos |
Posted on 18-05-2014 08:35
|
|
Member Location: Motril (Granada) España Posts: 2354 Joined: 02.09.09 |
Zeegers wrote: very interesting: black tegula, broad third antennal segment and a pair of median marignal bristles on syntergite 1&2: would imply S. hokkaidensis ?? you are not supposed to have this species, I think. I guess it has not been collected ? theo I did not know it could be interesting. Had I known, I would have tried to collect for you. Just take pictures, I have no knowledge of entomology. Just trying to harvest when I think it can be interesting for specialists. Will try capture, if I return to find her. If I have more photos, add some more. Would correct the name Siphona cf. hokkaidensis. I am very grateful for your support. Kind regards from southern Spain. José Marín |
|
|
|
| Maherjos |
Posted on 18-05-2014 10:50
|
|
Member Location: Motril (Granada) España Posts: 2354 Joined: 02.09.09 |
.
Maherjos attached the following image:  [122.92Kb] |
|
|
|
| Maherjos |
Posted on 18-05-2014 10:52
|
|
Member Location: Motril (Granada) España Posts: 2354 Joined: 02.09.09 |
.
Maherjos attached the following image:  [108.46Kb] |
|
|
|
| Maherjos |
Posted on 18-05-2014 10:53
|
|
Member Location: Motril (Granada) España Posts: 2354 Joined: 02.09.09 |
.
Maherjos attached the following image:  [118.45Kb] |
|
|
|
| Maherjos |
Posted on 18-05-2014 10:54
|
|
Member Location: Motril (Granada) España Posts: 2354 Joined: 02.09.09 |
.
Maherjos attached the following image:  [126.79Kb] |
|
|
|
| Zeegers |
Posted on 18-05-2014 17:26
|
|
Member Location: Soest, NL Posts: 18948 Joined: 21.07.04 |
Well, we never will be 100 % sure, but it does look like hokkaidensis. Would be the first for the Iberian peninsula Theo |
|
|
|
| Maherjos |
Posted on 18-05-2014 17:47
|
|
Member Location: Motril (Granada) España Posts: 2354 Joined: 02.09.09 |
Zeegers wrote: Well, we never will be 100 % sure, but it does look like hokkaidensis. Would be the first for the Iberian peninsula Theo Thanks for your reply Well, it would not be the first dipterous, who photographed for the first time in the Iberian Peninsula.  http://www.dipter...d_id=43641 As would be more accurate to call: Siphona hokkaidensis or Siphona cf. hokkaidensis ? It is a female? Kind regards Edited by Maherjos on 18-05-2014 18:06 |
|
|
|
| ChrisR |
Posted on 18-05-2014 18:51
|
 Super Administrator Location: Reading, England Posts: 7703 Joined: 12.07.04 |
With photos I would always use "cf." because they are difficult enough with specimens but with photos we can never know if we are seeing all of the characters clearly enough
Manager of the UK Species Inventory in the Angela Marmont Centre for UK Biodiversity at the Natural History Museum, London. |
 |
|
| Maherjos |
Posted on 18-05-2014 19:01
|
|
Member Location: Motril (Granada) España Posts: 2354 Joined: 02.09.09 |
ChrisR wrote: With photos I would always use "cf." because they are difficult enough with specimens but with photos we can never know if we are seeing all of the characters clearly enough I appreciate your instructions. So I edit the title. Best wishes from southern Spain. |
|
|
|
| Zeegers |
Posted on 18-05-2014 19:03
|
|
Member Location: Soest, NL Posts: 18948 Joined: 21.07.04 |
In the case of Siphona I am never sure. Other than this is a male Theo |
|
|
|
| Maherjos |
Posted on 18-05-2014 19:12
|
|
Member Location: Motril (Granada) España Posts: 2354 Joined: 02.09.09 |
Zeegers wrote: In the case of Siphona I am never sure. Other than this is a male Theo Thanks again, Theo. So I take it into consideration. Best wishes from southern Spain. José Marín |
|
|
|
| Jump to Forum: |