Diptera.info :: Identification queries :: Diptera (adults)
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
Elomya lateralis (Tachinidae)
|
|
Karol Ox |
Posted on 29-09-2013 17:46
|
Member Location: Slovakia Posts: 1317 Joined: 25.01.11 |
Hello, Phasia sp. is the correct? I have only this photo. 14.7.2013, Slovakia-Kosice. Thank you for your help. Karol. Karol Ox attached the following image: [104.04Kb] Edited by Karol Ox on 21-12-2014 08:57 |
Juergen Peters |
Posted on 29-09-2013 19:12
|
Member Location: northwest Germany Posts: 13617 Joined: 11.09.04 |
Hello, Karol! Karol Ox wrote: Phasia sp. is the correct? Looks more like Ectophasia to me. But wait for the experts. Best regards, Jürgen -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Juergen Peters Borgholzhausen, Germany WWW: http://insektenfo... -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= |
Karol Ox |
Posted on 30-09-2013 05:42
|
Member Location: Slovakia Posts: 1317 Joined: 25.01.11 |
Juergen Peters wrote: Hello, Karol! Karol Ox wrote: Phasia sp. is the correct? Looks more like Ectophasia to me. But wait for the experts. OK, thank you. |
Zeegers |
Posted on 30-09-2013 19:17
|
Member Location: Soest, NL Posts: 18518 Joined: 21.07.04 |
Topcel is closed, so Phasia. Most likely Ph. aurigera male Theo |
|
|
Piluca_Alvarez |
Posted on 30-09-2013 22:36
|
Member Location: Madrid, Spain Posts: 2431 Joined: 06.11.10 |
I always thought that Phasia aurigera had the petiolated cell more rounded shaped and Phasia hemiptera had this kind of more wavy shape Please, please, somebody confirm that I am wrong. If it is so I am making terrible mistakes in ID that I need to correct |
|
|
Juergen Peters |
Posted on 30-09-2013 23:27
|
Member Location: northwest Germany Posts: 13617 Joined: 11.09.04 |
Hi! I should keep my mouth shut, when it comes to determining flies... And that, after I had posted Phasia aurigera just some days ago: http://insektenfo...adID=63957 Best regards, Jürgen -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Juergen Peters Borgholzhausen, Germany WWW: http://insektenfo... -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= |
Karol Ox |
Posted on 01-10-2013 05:27
|
Member Location: Slovakia Posts: 1317 Joined: 25.01.11 |
Zeegers wrote: Topcel is closed, so Phasia. Most likely Ph. aurigera male Theo Thank you Theo. |
ChrisR |
Posted on 19-10-2013 22:16
|
Administrator Location: Reading, England Posts: 7699 Joined: 12.07.04 |
The petiole is too short for Phasia sp, so it looks like Elomyia lateralis to me - the petiole is short and curved forwards.
Manager of the UK Species Inventory in the Angela Marmont Centre for UK Biodiversity at the Natural History Museum, London. |
Zeegers |
Posted on 20-10-2013 08:20
|
Member Location: Soest, NL Posts: 18518 Joined: 21.07.04 |
Chris, seems you are right ! Theo |
|
|
ChrisR |
Posted on 20-10-2013 09:02
|
Administrator Location: Reading, England Posts: 7699 Joined: 12.07.04 |
Thanks Theo - it does happen occasionally One of these days I might actually see one of these flies but so far I have never been sent one. Are they just very local or can they be classed as uncommon or rare? Manager of the UK Species Inventory in the Angela Marmont Centre for UK Biodiversity at the Natural History Museum, London. |
Zeegers |
Posted on 21-10-2013 06:50
|
Member Location: Soest, NL Posts: 18518 Joined: 21.07.04 |
You mean Elomyia lateralis ? It is common in the south, and rare in local in Central -Europe. It has been recorded for long times in Germany. Theo |
|
|
ChrisR |
Posted on 21-10-2013 09:32
|
Administrator Location: Reading, England Posts: 7699 Joined: 12.07.04 |
Yes, Eliomyia ... I have received quite a lot of tachinid samples from southern Europe but they have never contained an Eliomyia. I'm just unlucky, I guess
Manager of the UK Species Inventory in the Angela Marmont Centre for UK Biodiversity at the Natural History Museum, London. |
pierred |
Posted on 20-12-2014 16:24
|
Member Location: Paris (France) Posts: 1413 Joined: 21.04.05 |
Hello, Could it be Elomya lateralis (Meigen, 1824)? See http://www.catalo...id/8734236 Pierre Duhem |
|
|
Karol Ox |
Posted on 21-12-2014 09:12
|
Member Location: Slovakia Posts: 1317 Joined: 25.01.11 |
pierred wrote: Hello, Could it be Elomya lateralis (Meigen, 1824)? See http://www.catalo...id/8734236 Hello. What do you mean? Is not it E. lateralis? |
Jump to Forum: |