Diptera.info :: Identification queries :: Diptera (adults)
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 Sciaridae, 2 Hymenoptera (Braconidae, Cynipoidea) and Diptera
|
|
| Heimlich |
Posted on 26-01-2012 11:04
|
 Member Location: Posts: 27 Joined: 26.01.12 |
Hi, I’ve found this species on highbush blueberry plants in late May. Heimlich attached the following image:  [127.94Kb] Edited by Heimlich on 04-02-2012 07:25 |
|
|
|
| Paul Beuk |
Posted on 26-01-2012 14:01
|
 Super Administrator Location: Netherlands Posts: 11805 Joined: 11.05.04 |
I'd say Sciaridae rather than Cecidomyiidae...
Paul - - - - Paul Beuk on www.diptera.info |
 |
|
| Heimlich |
Posted on 30-01-2012 16:15
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 27 Joined: 26.01.12 |
Thank you! ...and the fellow above is also from Sciaridae? |
|
|
|
| Heimlich |
Posted on 30-01-2012 16:17
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 27 Joined: 26.01.12 |
...and the fellow above is also from Sciaridae?
Heimlich attached the following image:  [47.52Kb] |
|
|
|
| Jason G |
Posted on 30-01-2012 17:44
|
 Member Location: London UK Posts: 135 Joined: 22.12.08 |
No, it has two pairs of wings, so not Diptera and from a better angle you'll note the constricted waist - so will be Hymenoptera. As to general and useful aestherics, you may also appreciate there are more antennal segments too. Still, both Sciaridae and Cecidomyiidae are alike in that they are Nematocerans, which have far more antennal segments than Brachycerans (just 3!), so mis-identifications happen. It just shows you're branching-out! Edited by Jason G on 30-01-2012 17:47 London's Insects http://londoninve...hostia.com |
|
|
|
| Heimlich |
Posted on 31-01-2012 01:07
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 27 Joined: 26.01.12 |
I see now, that I was in a big mistake! I thought all of them are pests of my blueberry plants - gall midges. but none of theme are this species. I've got two more species, that I firstly though, they may be gall midges, as I see now one for sure is not. Heimlich attached the following image:  [50.63Kb] |
|
|
|
| Heimlich |
Posted on 31-01-2012 01:09
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 27 Joined: 26.01.12 |
But this one seems to be Dasineura
Heimlich attached the following image:  [154.3Kb] |
|
|
|
| Jason G |
Posted on 31-01-2012 01:15
|
|
Member Location: London UK Posts: 135 Joined: 22.12.08 |
The insect in post #6 is another wasp species. The one pictured in #7 is a fly - I'll let someone else comment on that one. Look at the constriction between the thorax and abdomen in post #6. Compare that with #7, in which the thorax leads almost straight into the abdomen. Edited by Jason G on 31-01-2012 01:15 London's Insects http://londoninve...hostia.com |
|
|
|
| Heimlich |
Posted on 31-01-2012 01:27
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 27 Joined: 26.01.12 |
yes, now I see they are not so the same  you gave me a good lesson |
|
|
|
| Jason G |
Posted on 31-01-2012 01:33
|
|
Member Location: London UK Posts: 135 Joined: 22.12.08 |
Pleasure!
London's Insects http://londoninve...hostia.com |
|
|
|
| Paul Beuk |
Posted on 31-01-2012 11:02
|
|
Super Administrator Location: Netherlands Posts: 11805 Joined: 11.05.04 |
The second image appreas to be a Braconidae, the third is Cynipoidea, probably Figitidae. Now you can see why we need to have separate threads for unrelated images, as these two belong in a different forum on this site.
Paul - - - - Paul Beuk on www.diptera.info |
|
|
|
| Jump to Forum: |
http://www.luomus.
...what you prefer, we can discus this, during some good wine, cheese and many new pinned flies!