Diptera.info :: Identification queries :: Diptera (adults)
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 Eurithia sp.? (Eurithia cf. connivens)
|
|
| Mucha Fero |
Posted on 19-03-2011 17:15
|
 Member Location: Posts: 8179 Joined: 27.09.10 |
Eurithia sp. is the correct name? Thank you very much. Slovak Republik, Terchová region on the Malá Fatra 12.08.2010.  
Edited by Mucha Fero on 19-03-2011 17:35 |
|
|
|
| ChrisR |
Posted on 19-03-2011 17:24
|
 Administrator Location: Reading, England Posts: 7699 Joined: 12.07.04 |
Could this be the same fly in your previous photo? Definitely a Eurithia and with narrow vertex too.
Manager of the UK Species Inventory in the Angela Marmont Centre for UK Biodiversity at the Natural History Museum, London. |
 |
|
| Mucha Fero |
Posted on 19-03-2011 17:31
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 8179 Joined: 27.09.10 |
ChrisR wrote: Could this be the same fly in your previous photo? Definitely a Eurithia and with narrow vertex too. Chris thank you very much. |
|
|
|
| Zeegers |
Posted on 20-03-2011 09:24
|
|
Member Location: Soest, NL Posts: 18535 Joined: 21.07.04 |
I agree, this should be connivens as well Connivens is in my expercience far more common in Poland than anthophila, which is strange for us westeners, this here it is definitely vice versa. Maybe connivens is the dominant species in Czech republic as well. Erikas might fill in the status in Lithuania Theo |
|
|
|
| Mucha Fero |
Posted on 20-03-2011 09:57
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 8179 Joined: 27.09.10 |
Zeegers wrote: I agree, this should be connivens as well Connivens is in my expercience far more common in Poland than anthophila, which is strange for us westeners, this here it is definitely vice versa. Maybe connivens is the dominant species in Czech republic as well. Erikas might fill in the status in Lithuania Theo Theo thank you very much. |
|
|
|
| ChrisR |
Posted on 20-03-2011 10:01
|
|
Administrator Location: Reading, England Posts: 7699 Joined: 12.07.04 |
Zeegers wrote:Connivens is in my expercience far more common in Poland than anthophila, which is strange for us westeners, this here it is definitely vice versa. Strange isn't it ... here everything is either anthophila or consobrina ... we hardly ever see the other species. In fact, if I see any record for connivens, vivida, intermedia or caesia then I would flag those up for double-checking unless they had been caught by a really good Dipterist. 
Manager of the UK Species Inventory in the Angela Marmont Centre for UK Biodiversity at the Natural History Museum, London. |
|
|
|
| Mucha Fero |
Posted on 20-03-2011 11:54
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 8179 Joined: 27.09.10 |
ChrisR wrote: Zeegers wrote:Connivens is in my expercience far more common in Poland than anthophila, which is strange for us westeners, this here it is definitely vice versa. Strange isn't it ... here everything is either anthophila or consobrina ... we hardly ever see the other species. In fact, if I see any record for connivens, vivida, intermedia or caesia then I would flag those up for double-checking unless they had been caught by a really good Dipterist. Chris thank you very much. |
|
|
|
| neprisikiski |
Posted on 20-03-2011 15:56
|
|
Member Location: Lithuania Posts: 876 Joined: 23.02.09 |
Yes, we have similar situation like in Central Europe, where E. connivens is much more abundant than other species. All day you can collect almost exclusively E. connivens, though in some years some other species can be as much abundant, especially E. anthophila, or E. consobrina.
Erikas |
|
|
|
| Jump to Forum: |
but don't see the image in the post.