Gallery Links
Users Online
· Guests Online: 11

· Members Online: 0

· Total Members: 4,958
· Newest Member: Mikidebrouwer
Forum Threads
Theme Switcher
Switch to:
Last Seen Users
· Nosferatumyia00:36:51
· Tetrao02:40:03
· smol02:43:39
· binturong05:15:00
· cavedip05:54:22
· Vlieg07:09:32
· ESant07:10:13
· Juergen Peters07:22:11
· weia07:36:47
· John Carr08:11:11
Latest Photo Additions
View Thread
Diptera.info :: Identification queries :: Diptera (adults)
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 Print Thread
Smile and Say Cheese for the Group Portrait
Stephen
#1 Print Post
Posted on 03-09-2006 13:32
User Avatar

Member

Location: West Virginia USA
Posts: 1322
Joined: 12.04.05

There were many many flies on this section of lake shore and I suspect a fisherman had cleaned his fish here.

Maybe not enough detail to say for certain, but maybe two species of Calliphoridae and one Muscid?
Stephen attached the following image:


[166.27Kb]
--Stephen

Stephen Cresswell
www.americaninsects.net
 
www.americaninsects.net
Zeegers
#2 Print Post
Posted on 03-09-2006 14:38
Member

Location: Soest, NL
Posts: 18532
Joined: 21.07.04

Well, I agree with Calliphoridae and Muscidae.
The Calliphoridae seem to be 1 male and 2 females of Lucilia, they could very well represent the same species.
The Muscidae would be something like Morellia,
but remember this is the Old World speaking !


Theo Zeegers
 
Stephen
#3 Print Post
Posted on 03-09-2006 17:06
User Avatar

Member

Location: West Virginia USA
Posts: 1322
Joined: 12.04.05

Thanks, Theo! We in the New World do share Morellia with you. According to nearctica.com we have three species, M. micans, M. podagrica, and M. scapulata.

On the Calliphorids, the male looking more robust I had thought it might be a different species for that reason. Another thing I wondered about is that the two females are holding their wings differently from the male, but perhaps that is not an important thing?

Thanks again for your help.
--Stephen

Stephen Cresswell
www.americaninsects.net
 
www.americaninsects.net
Tony Irwin
#4 Print Post
Posted on 03-09-2006 22:32
User Avatar

Member

Location: Norwich, England
Posts: 7193
Joined: 19.11.04

I hesitate to disagree with Theo (experience tells me this is not a good idea! Wink), but I don't think the females are Lucilia. They're certainly not the same species as the male - much smaller scutellum, and a different bend in vein M (just visible on the upper fly). They may even be muscids - something close to Dasyphora. The angle at which they hold the wings is not always a good character, but it is a clue. In both Muscidae and Calliphoridae there are genera which tend to hold the wings out, and those which tend to overlap them.
I agree about the Morellia.
Tony
----------
Tony Irwin
 
Stephen
#5 Print Post
Posted on 04-09-2006 10:26
User Avatar

Member

Location: West Virginia USA
Posts: 1322
Joined: 12.04.05

Ah well the problem with this kind of group shot is that you don't get as many details for identification as you would when zooming in on a single fly. Thank-you Tony and Theo for the comments. I am slowly learning what characters to look for!

Question: Is it generally safe in Muscidae and Calliphoridae to say that the flies with the eyes touching up above are males, and if the eyes are well-separated they are females? I have never been clear on which families (if any) this rule is true for.
Edited by Stephen on 04-09-2006 10:29
--Stephen

Stephen Cresswell
www.americaninsects.net
 
www.americaninsects.net
Zeegers
#6 Print Post
Posted on 04-09-2006 12:07
Member

Location: Soest, NL
Posts: 18532
Joined: 21.07.04

Well, Tony,
in case on non-Tachinidae your judgement is easily superior to mind.

Like in this case

Theo
 
Xespok
#7 Print Post
Posted on 04-09-2006 14:36
User Avatar

Member

Location: Debrecen, Hungary
Posts: 5550
Joined: 02.03.05

THe larger species could be a Lucilia the smaller species a Phormia. But do not consider these IDs anywhere near sure.
 
Teglagyar u. 30.
Jump to Forum:
Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
--> Sylvicola fuscatus group Diptera (adults) 5 11-04-2024 11:23
Rhamphomyia (Empididae) from 31.03.24 --> R. sulcata group Diptera (adults) 3 10-04-2024 18:24
Phasia barbifrons? -> Phasia sp. (pusilla group) Diptera (adults) 5 31-03-2024 15:49
Lauxaniidae or Drosophilidae? -> Minettia fasciata-group Diptera (adults) 6 17-03-2024 10:28
Heleomyzinae --> Heleomyza modesta-group Diptera (adults) 8 10-03-2024 20:39
Date and time
02 May 2024 06:56
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Temporary email?
Due to fact this site has functionality making use of your email address, any registration using a temporary email address will be rejected.

Paul
Donate
Please, help to make
Diptera.info
possible and enable
further improvements!
Latest Articles
Syrph the Net
Those who want to have access to the Syrph the Net database need to sign the
License Agreement -
Click to Download


Public files of Syrph the Net can be downloaded HERE

Last updated: 25.08.2011
Shoutbox
You must login to post a message.

07.03.24 00:01
Some flies preserved in ethanol and then pinned often get the eyes sunken, how can this be avoided? Best answer: I usually keep alcohol-collected material in alcohol

17.08.23 15:23
Aneomochtherus

17.08.23 13:54
Tony, I HAD a blank in the file name. Sorry!

17.08.23 13:44
Tony, thanks! I tried it (see "Cylindromyia" Wink but don't see the image in the post.

17.08.23 11:37
pjt - just send the post and attached image. Do not preview thread, as this will lose the link to the image,

16.08.23 08:37
Tried to attach an image to a forum post. jpg, 32kB, 72dpi, no blanks, ... File name is correctly displayed, but when I click "Preview Thread" it just vanishes. Help!

23.02.23 21:29
Has anyone used the Leica DM500, any comments.

27.12.22 21:10
Thanks, Jan Willem! Much appreciated. Grin

19.12.22 11:33
Thanks Paul for your work on keeping this forum available! Just made a donation via PayPal.

09.10.22 17:07
Yes, dipterologists from far abroad, please buy your copy at veldshop. Stamps will be expensive, but he, the book is unreasonably cheap Smile

Render time: 0.93 seconds | 192,061,684 unique visits