Diptera.info :: Identification queries :: Diptera (adults)
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
Page 2 of 2: 12
|
 male Rondania dispar from Valdelinares - Spain
|
|
| jorgemotalmeida |
Posted on 02-09-2009 19:17
|
 Member Location: Viseu - PORTUGAL Posts: 9296 Joined: 05.06.06 |
at least with my hand loupe I don't see any conspicuous hairs in prosternum. Neither in the photo.. I will try with a stereomicroscope - still I do not have one. |
 |
|
| Zeegers |
Posted on 02-09-2009 20:51
|
|
Member Location: Soest, NL Posts: 18536 Joined: 21.07.04 |
Well, sounds like Erikas is right. Theo |
|
|
|
| jorgemotalmeida |
Posted on 02-09-2009 20:52
|
|
Member Location: Viseu - PORTUGAL Posts: 9296 Joined: 05.06.06 |
Thanks to all. I will put this as male Rondania dispar.  |
|
|
|
| jorgemotalmeida |
Posted on 02-09-2009 21:13
|
|
Member Location: Viseu - PORTUGAL Posts: 9296 Joined: 05.06.06 |
photo taken by Andrade... it was told that this is a male of Rondania dispar... So I'm confused... this has no proclinate brisltes in the parafrontalia , also the distance form the eyes is bmuch bigger than my specimen...
jorgemotalmeida attached the following image:  [81.07Kb] |
|
|
|
| jorgemotalmeida |
Posted on 03-09-2009 09:54
|
|
Member Location: Viseu - PORTUGAL Posts: 9296 Joined: 05.06.06 |
hmm.. doubts were cleared up. The above photo of Andrade is from a female and not a male. Curious to see some specimens of Andrade (where all are females) with proclinate brisltes in parafrontalia and others without them... |
|
|
|
| Zeegers |
Posted on 05-09-2009 15:16
|
|
Member Location: Soest, NL Posts: 18536 Joined: 21.07.04 |
Rui is in error, it is clearly a female Theo |
|
|
|
Page 2 of 2: 12
| Jump to Forum: |
but don't see the image in the post.