Gallery Links
Users Online
· Guests Online: 22

· Members Online: 0

· Total Members: 3,117
· Newest Member: puggehatt
Paul Beuk's Book Reviews
Newest books:
· The European fami...
· De Nederlandse zw...
· The Diptera of th...
Most popular books:
· The Diptera of th...
· De Nederlandse zw...
· The European fami...

Looking for something in particular?
Use search!
Forum Threads
Theme Switcher
Switch to:
Last Seen Users
· Nosferatumyia00:12:18
· Graeme Cocks04:07:11
· nadia05:15:12
· alepercol05:17:17
· John Carr05:17:23
· AhBek05:56:55
· andrewsi06:23:34
· Gunnar M Kvifte06:45:49
· Tony Irwin06:57:11
· piros07:06:33
Latest Photo Additions
View Thread
Diptera.info :: Identification queries :: Other insects, spiders, etc.
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 Print Thread
Bees or bumblebees?
Alvesgaspar
#1 Print Post
Posted on 12-02-2008 00:11
User Avatar

Member

Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 557
Joined: 24.08.07

I'm having trouble in the identification of black bees (or bumblebees?) which I thought were all ''Xylocopa violacea''. However, someone assured me they were not. Here they are, together with my best guess:

#1 - Xylocopa violacea ?
#2 - Anthophora plumipes ?
#3 - Bombus sp.?

Thank you,

Joaquim Gaspar
Alvesgaspar attached the following image:


[121.17Kb]
 
Alvesgaspar
#2 Print Post
Posted on 12-02-2008 00:11
User Avatar

Member

Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 557
Joined: 24.08.07

2nd photo: Anthophora plumipes?
Alvesgaspar attached the following image:


[123.01Kb]
 
Alvesgaspar
#3 Print Post
Posted on 12-02-2008 00:12
User Avatar

Member

Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 557
Joined: 24.08.07

... and last one: Bombus sp. (but which one) ?
Alvesgaspar attached the following image:


[125.5Kb]
 
pierred
#4 Print Post
Posted on 12-02-2008 07:14
User Avatar

Member

Location: Paris (France)
Posts: 1082
Joined: 21.04.05

Hello,

For me, the two last ones are X. violacea male (see the reddish tip of the antennas). For the first one, it is more difficult, since one doesn't see the antennas.
Pierre Duhem
 
jorgemotalmeida
#5 Print Post
Posted on 12-02-2008 11:44
User Avatar

Member

Location: Viseu - PORTUGAL
Posts: 9165
Joined: 05.06.06

Xylocopa sp. at least. We have more Xylocopa Pierre. Smile I don?t know if there are other Xylocopa with that red tip, though.
 
http://www.flickr.com/photos/superegnum
Alvesgaspar
#6 Print Post
Posted on 12-02-2008 13:41
User Avatar

Member

Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 557
Joined: 24.08.07

Are you sure, Jorge? I read that Xylocopa don't have the hairy abdomens of pics 2 and 3. Also, the eyes reaching the jaws and the rust-coloured pollen brushes in the hind legs (pic 2) are typical of Anthophora plumipes
 
Susan R Walter
#7 Print Post
Posted on 12-02-2008 15:00
User Avatar

Member

Location: Touraine du Sud, central France
Posts: 1715
Joined: 14.01.06

The middle one is definitely not Anthophora plumipes. They do not have darkened wings and are just a different shape altogether.


Susan
 
http://loirenature.blogspot.com/
Christian Schmid-Egger
#8 Print Post
Posted on 12-02-2008 17:27
Member

Location: Germany, Berlin
Posts: 233
Joined: 05.08.05

Okay, so I will add a forth opinion. The results in brief (and therefore I can confirme Pierre and Susan):

All specimens are Xylocopa. Specimen in the middle and below is a male of X. violacea, above I cannot regonize sex or species. Males of X. violacea are unique in Europe by having second last flagellomeres read. Gaster is covered with small black setae (hairs), which in a special light may appear like a dense coat. Eyes does not reach mandible, there is a small space inbetween. Yellow pollen in legs is typical for all bees visting flowers with yellow pollen (there are no typical pollen storing brushes on photos).
Most common Xylocopa species in Europe are violacea, valga and iris, in Spain and Portugal are some more, very rare species, I have to look in a list for species names.

Anthophora never has such black wings with violet lustre, but some Andrena and other genera have. Also, there is no all black Bombus in
Europe, but 2-3 Anthophora species. But, they look different. See www.galerie.hymis.de, Anthophora retusa and black form of plumipes.
Did I forgot anything?

Regards. Christian
More Hymenoptera Photos on www.galerie.hymis.de
 
www.hymis.eu, www.bembix.de
Alvesgaspar
#9 Print Post
Posted on 12-02-2008 22:23
User Avatar

Member

Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 557
Joined: 24.08.07

No, Christian, you did not forget anything. Thank you very much to all of you Grin
 
Jump to Forum:
Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
Hoverflies labeled as Bees in the Press again General queries 2 16-07-2014 13:44
Naughty Bees (Lasioglossum, Thank you Lars) Other insects, spiders, etc. 5 14-09-2009 22:09
Bumblebees Other insects, spiders, etc. 3 04-09-2008 09:16
Mating small bees Other insects, spiders, etc. 4 14-06-2008 13:56
Bees ID and behavior interpretation Other insects, spiders, etc. 7 15-05-2008 23:24
Date and time
22 December 2014 07:14
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Temporary email?
Due to fact this site has functionality making use of your email address, any registration using a temporary email address will be rejected.

Paul
Donate
attentionattention
Please help to make
Diptera.info
possible and enable
further improvements!
Latest Articles
Syrph the Net
Those who want to have access to the Syrph the Net database need to sign the
License Agreement -
Click to Download


Public files of Syrph the Net can be downloaded HERE

Last updated: 25.08.2011
Shoutbox
You must login to post a message.

15.12.14 15:40
Thx very much- this comes up quite a bit so very useful

11.12.14 18:25
is right!

11.12.14 16:36
Can any1 tell me if this is right Nach Smith 1912 = According to Smith 1912 Thx

11.12.14 16:35
Useful article http://www.eafe.or
g/Members_area_fil
es/Szpila_key_blow
flies_larva.pdf Wish there was 1 for Muscidae

10.12.14 21:41
at least now you can find out!

09.12.14 09:13
yes, from the Neotropical. It is still an open question whether these are really Chvalaea.

09.12.14 08:20
Quote from the abstract

09.12.14 08:19
" ... Ale-Roche, ..., including the description of the first males of the genus"

08.12.14 22:17
No, Theo, he recorded a female Chvalaea!

08.12.14 19:00
Ruud, jere beat you http://dx.doi.org/
10.11646/zootaxa.3
716.4.7

Render time: 5.33 seconds | 93,072,766 unique visits