Diptera.info :: Identification queries :: Diptera (adults)
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 Images from Japan. Brachycera or Nematocera
|
|
| Xespok |
Posted on 06-10-2005 10:26
|
 Member Location: Debrecen, Hungary Posts: 5551 Joined: 02.03.05 |
Normally I can separate most Diptera to at least these two categories, but with this one I have problems. Unfortunately the image is not fine enough to count the number of antenna segments. The antennae are very long, which hints to Nematocera, the overall structure however suggests Asilidae or Empididae. 
Edited by Xespok on 06-10-2005 16:19 |
 |
|
| Paul Beuk |
Posted on 06-10-2005 11:42
|
 Super Administrator Location: Netherlands Posts: 19403 Joined: 11.05.04 |
Unfortunately I cannot make out the wing venation because the essential part is blotted out by the darker background. Any chance it might be more clearly visible in the original image? Further, it reminds me of Trichopeza longicornis of the Empididae but I do not know if that species occurs in Japan or even related genera/species. Paul - - - - Paul Beuk on https://diptera.info |
|
|
|
| Xespok |
Posted on 06-10-2005 16:36
|
|
Member Location: Debrecen, Hungary Posts: 5551 Joined: 02.03.05 |
This genus does not occur in Honshu. Based on the database the following genera should occur: Empidinae: Empis, Rhamphomyia, Hilara, Oreogeton, Clinocerinae: Trichoclinocera, Acanthoclinocera, Heleodromia, Brachystoma Hybotinae: Hybos, Syneches, Chillcottomyia, Ocydromiinae: Bicellaria, Euthyneura, Euthyneura, Leptopeza, Trichina, Tachydromiinae: Symballophthalmus, \ Hemerodromiinae: Xanthodromia, Chelifera, Dolichocephala Is this Trichopeza Clinocerinae? But I think there might be quite a few species of Empididae to be described in Japan. |
|
|
|
| Paul Beuk |
Posted on 06-10-2005 20:28
|
|
Super Administrator Location: Netherlands Posts: 19403 Joined: 11.05.04 |
Of all these genera, the only one I do not really know is Oreogeton. Trichopeza is currently placed in the subfamily Trichopezinae and not in Oreogetoninae, though...
Paul - - - - Paul Beuk on https://diptera.info |
|
|
|
| Xespok |
Posted on 08-10-2005 03:26
|
|
Member Location: Debrecen, Hungary Posts: 5551 Joined: 02.03.05 |
Paul, I forgot to mention that I have another image of this fly, which probably helps you out with the wing venation. http://xespok.net...dae?page=3 Also, could this fly not belong to Xylophagidae? I have not considered that option yet. |
|
|
|
| Paul Beuk |
Posted on 10-10-2005 08:37
|
|
Super Administrator Location: Netherlands Posts: 19403 Joined: 11.05.04 |
Hmm, no Xylophagidae as far as I can tell, but I cannot really make a good empid of it either. I will get back to this one.
Paul - - - - Paul Beuk on https://diptera.info |
|
|
|
| Xespok |
Posted on 01-01-2008 19:46
|
|
Member Location: Debrecen, Hungary Posts: 5551 Joined: 02.03.05 |
I raise this very old thread, maybe some new eyes can tell us more.
Gabor Keresztes Japan Wildlife Gallery Carpathian Basin Wildlife Gallery |
|
|
|
| jorgemotalmeida |
Posted on 01-01-2008 19:51
|
 Member Location: Viseu - PORTUGAL Posts: 9296 Joined: 05.06.06 |
it seems an empidoid.. |
|
|
|
| John Carr |
Posted on 10-01-2013 00:24
|
 Super Administrator Location: Massachusetts, USA Posts: 10430 Joined: 22.10.10 |
I vote Blephariceridae. (Found this old thread searching on something unrelated.) |
|
|
|
| Xespok |
Posted on 10-01-2013 07:05
|
|
Member Location: Debrecen, Hungary Posts: 5551 Joined: 02.03.05 |
Yes, Blephariceridae it will be, possibly Agathon sp. Thanks for solving this old mystery.
Gabor Keresztes Japan Wildlife Gallery Carpathian Basin Wildlife Gallery |
|
|
|
| jorgemotalmeida |
Posted on 27-10-2013 15:56
|
|
Member Location: Viseu - PORTUGAL Posts: 9296 Joined: 05.06.06 |
I agree. It is a Blephariceridae! Great find. And you can see the secondary veins.  |
|
|
|
| Jump to Forum: |