Gallery Links
Users Online
· Guests Online: 27

· Members Online: 0

· Total Members: 5,087
· Newest Member: Esteban
Forum Threads
Theme Switcher
Switch to:
Last Seen Users
· weia00:12:58
· Oryctes00:22:11
· Tony Irwin00:43:13
· RBack01:52:28
· John Carr02:14:55
· Jan Maca02:17:39
· caliprobola02:24:49
· daveb2102:25:17
· Moumoule03:04:38
· Reimund Ley03:16:17
Latest Photo Additions
View Thread
Diptera.info :: Identification queries :: Diptera (adults)
 Print Thread
Tachinidae - Pelatachina tibialis prob.
tim worfolk
#1 Print Post
Posted on 29-05-2009 07:01
User Avatar

Member

Location: Devon, England
Posts: 737
Joined: 05.05.09

I expected this to be a species I'd recently requested an ID for, however I can't seem to match it with anything. So, at the risk of wasting your time, can anyone help?

Devon, England
28/5/2009
Hedge/meadow.

Thanks

Tim
tim worfolk attached the following image:


[126.33Kb]
Edited by tim worfolk on 29-05-2009 14:46
 
Zeegers
#2 Print Post
Posted on 29-05-2009 08:18
Member

Location: Soest, NL
Posts: 19296
Joined: 21.07.04

Looks like Macquartia, however, the apicalscutellar bristles are lacking.

So Cleonica callida (?)

How rare is that in Britain ?

Theo
 
ChrisR
#3 Print Post
Posted on 29-05-2009 09:03
User Avatar

Super Administrator

Location: Reading, England
Posts: 7706
Joined: 12.07.04

Cleonice ... just a tad rare ... known from 2 records from southern counties by 1996 ... I think I heard of 1 more record from last year but I haven't seen the specimen yet Smile

So, Tim is in the perfect county to see rarities like Cleonice so we can't discount it. Smile

I have never seen Cleonice but one thing I noticed about Tim's fly is that it seems to have quite a small eye and relatively deep gena ... not sure if that is any clue.
Edited by ChrisR on 29-05-2009 09:05
Manager of the UK Species Inventory in the Angela Marmont Centre for UK Biodiversity at the Natural History Museum, London.
 
http://tachinidae.org.uk
tim worfolk
#4 Print Post
Posted on 29-05-2009 10:15
User Avatar

Member

Location: Devon, England
Posts: 737
Joined: 05.05.09

Thanks both of you, sounds like a really interesting find. I take from (?) that you are not 100% certain, Theo; is there some way different photos would help? I only took 3 shots and all are from the same angle, but I'll post more if I get them.

A quick bit of research suggests a preference for woodland - and particularly poplar - the site was definitely not woodland, rather a very old hedge with a lot of mature trees, mostly oak. The nearest poplar is a planted belt about 200m away.

Chris, are records such as this (assuming it could be confirmed from a photo) any use to you, or do you always require a specimen?

This site, an organic farm almost adjacent to my house, has turned up quite a few notable insect species in the last few years, I still wonder what else is out there...

Tim
 
Zeegers
#5 Print Post
Posted on 29-05-2009 13:42
Member

Location: Soest, NL
Posts: 19296
Joined: 21.07.04

Sorry guys, I just noticed the tibiae are slightly reddish, so that brings Pelatachina tibialis in mind. Female Pelatachina is from picture very similar to female Cleonice, though Pelatachina is distinctly larger.
In any case, the ocellars are fine, excluding Cleonice.

So no Cleonice and most likely Pelatachina tibialis female


Theo
 
tim worfolk
#6 Print Post
Posted on 29-05-2009 14:48
User Avatar

Member

Location: Devon, England
Posts: 737
Joined: 05.05.09

Thanks Theo, I've edited the thread title accordingly.

Tim
 
ChrisR
#7 Print Post
Posted on 29-05-2009 14:58
User Avatar

Super Administrator

Location: Reading, England
Posts: 7706
Joined: 12.07.04

Tim Worfolk wrote:
Chris, are records such as this (assuming it could be confirmed from a photo) any use to you, or do you always require a specimen?

All tachinid records are gratefully received as long as there is a high-degree of confidence in the ID. For rarities, such as Cleonice (if it had been this species) then a specimen would be very good - I don't think we could have accepted the ID if there was any doubt in Theo's mind. Smile
Manager of the UK Species Inventory in the Angela Marmont Centre for UK Biodiversity at the Natural History Museum, London.
 
http://tachinidae.org.uk
Zeegers
#8 Print Post
Posted on 29-05-2009 17:14
Member

Location: Soest, NL
Posts: 19296
Joined: 21.07.04

I agree, rarities should be confirmed by specimens unless unmistably obvious (such as male Phasia aurigera).

All my ID's are (at most) 90 - 95 % reliable, that is, is something very unusual pops up, I'm likely to miss it.
There are simply to many species of Tachinidae to be able to give a 100 % from picture, in most cases.

this one, on the other hand, is my mistake. 'Resembles Macquartia' got me into Cleonice, whereas Pelatachina more or less resembles Macquartia as well and is much more common (also in the UK ?)

Theo
 
tim worfolk
#9 Print Post
Posted on 29-05-2009 21:43
User Avatar

Member

Location: Devon, England
Posts: 737
Joined: 05.05.09

I agree completely with the both of you, I was merely wondering about cases (probably not that many, I admit) where identification could be established with 100% certainty from a photograph. Obviously my interest is in taking photographs rather than specimens (I'd like to do both but I don't have the time). I'd be happy if I could contribute in a small way by submitting records of what I can be sure of.

Tim
 
ChrisR
#10 Print Post
Posted on 29-05-2009 23:00
User Avatar

Super Administrator

Location: Reading, England
Posts: 7706
Joined: 12.07.04

Zeegers wrote:
Pelatachina more or less resembles Macquartia as well and is much more common (also in the UK ?)

Yes, I'd say it is fairly frequent/common in the UK Smile
Manager of the UK Species Inventory in the Angela Marmont Centre for UK Biodiversity at the Natural History Museum, London.
 
http://tachinidae.org.uk
ChrisR
#11 Print Post
Posted on 29-05-2009 23:02
User Avatar

Super Administrator

Location: Reading, England
Posts: 7706
Joined: 12.07.04

Tim Worfolk wrote:
I'd be happy if I could contribute in a small way by submitting records of what I can be sure of.

... and we'd be very happy to have them - anything from Tachina fera and Eriothrix rufomaculata right up to the Cleonice callida of this world Wink
Manager of the UK Species Inventory in the Angela Marmont Centre for UK Biodiversity at the Natural History Museum, London.
 
http://tachinidae.org.uk
Zeegers
#12 Print Post
Posted on 30-05-2009 09:40
Member

Location: Soest, NL
Posts: 19296
Joined: 21.07.04

Actually, diptera.info has contributed significantly to the recent knowledge on distributional pattern, so keep them coming !

More pics of the same fly make a positive ID more likely.

In 3 pics of this one I would inmediately have noticed the reddish tibiae in at least one.
So, the more, the better, even from the same fly !


Theo
 
Jump to Forum:
Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
Tachinidae - female Blepharomyia pagana. Diptera (adults) 10 28-02-2026 20:02
Tachinidae->Nilea? Diptera (adults) 6 27-02-2026 20:53
Tachinidae Hyperaea femoralis ? Diptera (adults) 6 13-02-2026 13:21
Tachinidae ID Diptera (adults) 11 09-02-2026 15:46
Tachinidae Diptera (adults) 4 08-02-2026 21:10
Date and time
23 March 2026 18:39
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Temporary email?
Due to fact this site has functionality making use of your email address, any registration using a temporary email address will be rejected.

Paul
Donate
Please, help to make
Diptera.info
possible and enable
further improvements!
Latest Articles
Syrph the Net
Those who want to have access to the Syrph the Net database need to sign the
License Agreement -
Click to Download


Public files of Syrph the Net can be downloaded HERE

Last updated: 25.08.2011
Shoutbox
You must login to post a message.

20.02.26 13:31
Canada plans to eliminate the Diptera group at the CNC. See post in the News section of the main page.

18.02.26 09:33
Anyone have scans of the Genus Semaranga in: 1)Kanmiya, K. (1983) A systematic study of the Japanese Chloropidae (Diptera). 2) Andersson, H. (1977 Taxonomic and Phylogenetic studies on Chloropid

10.02.26 19:36
Hello Moumoule !

07.01.26 15:52
Pipunculidae from Mongolia! I am looking for specialist who is committed to ID these. There will be a lot of material coming from my expeditions.

06.12.25 21:37
He last posted here in April, identifying some Chloropidae.

04.12.25 20:02
Dr Michael von Tschirnhaus, a leading expert on Chloropidae and Agromyzidae, died on 16 September 2025 at the age of 86. He will be greatly missed by the international community. R.I.P.

03.12.25 12:46
Anyone has the scan of "Harkness, R. D.; Ismay, J. W. 1976: A new species of Trachysiphonella (Dipt., Chloropidae) from Greece, associated with an ant Cataglyphis bicolor (F.) (Hym., Formicidae)

01.12.25 22:29
I will try to fix the messages this month. We have to make some other configuration changes before software goes out of support at end of year.

29.11.25 21:57
I would prefer not to receive any more messages from diptera.info signed by Paul... (Thread reply notification)... Could they be signed by ‘The diptera.info team’?

19.11.25 12:31
It is with deepest sadness in my heart that I announce that on Saturday, November 15, one of the great minds of world dipterology, prof. Rudolf Rozkošny, left us forever. Please remember him with a

Render time: 1.73 seconds | 264,490,264 unique visits